CISG by jurisdiction
Admin area
Hong Kong SAR (China)
![Hong Kong SAR (China)](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Status under the CISG:
Contracting State territory
Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China, has without doubt been a CISG Contracting territory since 1 December 2022.
Prior to this date, Hong Kong's status under the CISG was uncertain (see in more detail below).
No reservations are in effect for Hong Kong. In particular, the Art. 95 CISG reservation in effect for the People's Republic of China does not extend to the Hong Kong SAR.
Further information:
Uncertainty regarding Hong Kong's status under the CISG between 1 July 1997 and 30 November 2022
Until 1 December 2022, the status of Hong Kong under the CISG was uncertain. The reasons for this uncertainty, briefly described, were as follows:
Prior to 1 December 2022 Hong Kong was not mentioned, and had never been mentioned, on the official list of CISG Contracting States kept and communicated to States by the Secretary-General of the United Nations in his role as depositary of the Sales Convention in accordance with Art. 89 CISG and Art. 77(1)(e) of the Vienna Convention on the Law Applicable to Treaties (1969).
Until 30 June 1997, Hong Kong had been a British Dependent Territory under the sovereignty of the United Kingdom, a CISG Non-Contracting State. On 1 July 1997, the sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred to the People's Republic of China through the so-called "handover". Hong Kong became and has since been a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China. The People's Republic of China has been a CISG Contracting State already since 1988. The handover thus resulted in the territory of Hong Kong changing from being part of a CISG Non-Contracting State (UK) to a CISG Contracting State (China). The effects of this somewhat unusual process are not expressly addressed in the 1980 Sales Convention, resulting in uncertainty about Hong Kong's post-handover status under the CISG.
An important point of dispute resulted from the wording of Art. 93 CISG and this provision's applicability, if any, to the status of Hong Kong under the CISG: Art. 93(1) CISG authorizes each Contracting State that has two or more territorial units in which, according to its constitution, different systems of law are applicable in relation to the matters dealt with in this Convention to declare that the Convention is to extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them. Art. 31 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for the establishment of special administrative regions (like the Hong Kong SAR) that arguably qualify as "territorial units" in the sense of Art. 93(1) CISG. Furthermore, under the "one country, two systems" principle, the system of law applicable in the Hong Kong SAR relation to sales contracts is different from the system of law applicable in this regard in the PRC. Accordingly, the argument was made that Art. 93 CISG applied to the pre-2022 post-handover situation regarding Hong Kong. At the same time, the provision has clearly not been drafted with the scenario like the "handover" – a CISG Contracting State's post-accession extension by a territorial unit that did not form part of the State when it became a Contracting State – in mind.
The most significant difficulty raised by Art. 93 CISG's potential application to Hong Kong resulted from Art. 93(4) CISG. This provision reads:
If a Contracting State makes no declaration under paragraph (1) of this article, the Convention is to extend to all territorial units of that State.
Whenever Art. 93 CISG was considered applicable to post-1997 Hong Kong, Art. 93(4) CISG thus by law made the 1980 Sales Convention applicable to the Hong Kong SAR at that time, unless one reached the conclusion that the People's Republic of China had made a declaration to the Convention's depositary declaring that the CISG does not apply to Hong Kong. However, none of the declarations made by China in connection with the handover or later explicitly mentioned the CISG, and it was disputed whether any of the generic clauses in one of China's declarations to the UN Secretary-General could be construed as also referring to the CISG, or as constituting a declaration "equivalent to" the one envisaged by Art. 93(1) CISG.
Against this background, courts from a number of countries had to grapple with the question whether parties from Hong Kong were to be considered parties that had their place of business in a "Contracting State" for the purpose of Art. 1(1)(a) and (b) CISG, or not. Case law addressing this question was divided, both in outcome and in underlying reasoning. It has been summarized on a separate page:
Case law on the status of the Hong Kong SAR under the CISG (1997–2022)
On 4 May 2022, the People's Republic of China then made a declaration to the CISG's depositary providing that the Sales Convention would apply to Hong Kong from 1 December 2022 onwards, thereby removing the uncertainty that existed between 1997 and 2022. For purposes of the Convention's applicability in accordance with Art. 1(1)(a) or (b) CISG, parties with their place of business in the Hong Kong SAR are parties with a place of business in a CISG Contracting State when it comes to sales contracts concluded on or after 1 December 2022.
2020 Consultation on the Proposed Application of the CISG to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
In May 2019, the Hong Kong SAR's Department of Justice announced its intention to conduct a public consultation regarding the explicit extension of the 1980 Sales Convention to Hong Kong.
On 27 May 2019, the Legislative Council's Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the matter and concluded that it in general supported the approach of the proposed application of CISG.
Between 2 March and 30 September 2020, the Hong Kong Department of Justice conducted a public consultation on the proposed application of CISG to the Hong Kong SAR. The consultation was commenced by issuing a comprehensive Consultation Paper, accompanied by a Press Release.
On 22 March 2021, the Legislative Council's Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the outcome of the public consulation.
Department of Justice of Hong Kong, Paper: Proposed Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (March 2021), CB(4)648/20-21(03), 49 pp. (informing the members of the Legislative Council about the outcome of the public consultation, including the full text of most responses to the consultation)
2021 Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance
Taking into account the outcome of the public consultation, the Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill, which aimed to implement the CISG in the Hong Kong SAR, was introduced into the Legislative Council on 14 July 2021.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill
Legislative Council Brief: Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill, File Ref.: IL/ ITF/ 1/ 81
The Bill was passed by the Legislative Council on 29 September 2021, enacting the Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance, Ord. No. 30 of 2021
According to a notice by the Hong Kong Secretary for Justice published in the Gazette, the Ordinance came into operation on 1 December 2022.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance (Commencement) Notice, L.N. 160 of 2022
Published CISG cases adjudicated by courts in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
Published CISG cases worldwide involving parties from the Hong Kong SAR (China):
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court)
Denmark, 23 October 2015 – H-67-14, CISG-online 4309
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court)
Denmark, 23 October 2015 – H-67-14, CISG-online 4309
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Parties from the Hong Kong SAR most frequently settled their CISG disputes in:
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
Goods most frequently traded under the CISG by buyers and sellers from the Hong Kong SAR:
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Parties from the Hong Kong SAR were involved in CISG transactions:
CISG decisions by courts in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
CISG decisions in arbitrations administered by institutions based in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
Arbitral awards rendered in arbitrations with seat in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
![Czech Republic](/css/flags/blank.gif)
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Hong Kong SAR (China), Nov 2006 – CISG/2006/12, CISG-online 1926