CISG by jurisdiction
Admin area
Hong Kong SAR (China)
Status under the CISG:
Contracting State territory
Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China, has without doubt been a CISG Contracting territory since 1 December 2022.
Prior to this date, Hong Kong's status under the CISG was uncertain (see in more detail below).
No reservations are in effect for Hong Kong. In particular, the Art. 95 CISG reservation in effect for the People's Republic of China does not extend to the Hong Kong SAR.
Further information:
Uncertainty regarding Hong Kong's status under the CISG between 1 July 1997 and 30 November 2022
Until 1 December 2022, the status of Hong Kong under the CISG was uncertain. The reasons for this uncertainty, briefly described, were as follows:
Prior to 1 December 2022 Hong Kong was not mentioned, and had never been mentioned, on the official list of CISG Contracting States kept and communicated to States by the Secretary-General of the United Nations in his role as depositary of the Sales Convention in accordance with Art. 89 CISG and Art. 77(1)(e) of the Vienna Convention on the Law Applicable to Treaties (1969).
Until 30 June 1997, Hong Kong had been a British Dependent Territory under the sovereignty of the United Kingdom, a CISG Non-Contracting State. On 1 July 1997, the sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred to the People's Republic of China through the so-called "handover". Hong Kong became and has since been a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China. The People's Republic of China has been a CISG Contracting State already since 1988. The handover thus resulted in the territory of Hong Kong changing from being part of a CISG Non-Contracting State (UK) to a CISG Contracting State (China). The effects of this somewhat unusual process are not expressly addressed in the 1980 Sales Convention, resulting in uncertainty about Hong Kong's post-handover status under the CISG.
An important point of dispute resulted from the wording of Art. 93 CISG and this provision's applicability, if any, to the status of Hong Kong under the CISG: Art. 93(1) CISG authorizes each Contracting State that has two or more territorial units in which, according to its constitution, different systems of law are applicable in relation to the matters dealt with in this Convention to declare that the Convention is to extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them. Art. 31 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for the establishment of special administrative regions (like the Hong Kong SAR) that arguably qualify as "territorial units" in the sense of Art. 93(1) CISG. Furthermore, under the "one country, two systems" principle, the system of law applicable in the Hong Kong SAR relation to sales contracts is different from the system of law applicable in this regard in the PRC. Accordingly, the argument was made that Art. 93 CISG applied to the pre-2022 post-handover situation regarding Hong Kong. At the same time, the provision has clearly not been drafted with the scenario like the "handover" – a CISG Contracting State's post-accession extension by a territorial unit that did not form part of the State when it became a Contracting State – in mind.
The most significant difficulty raised by Art. 93 CISG's potential application to Hong Kong resulted from Art. 93(4) CISG. This provision reads:
If a Contracting State makes no declaration under paragraph (1) of this article, the Convention is to extend to all territorial units of that State.
Whenever Art. 93 CISG was considered applicable to post-1997 Hong Kong, Art. 93(4) CISG thus by law made the 1980 Sales Convention applicable to the Hong Kong SAR at that time, unless one reached the conclusion that the People's Republic of China had made a declaration to the Convention's depositary declaring that the CISG does not apply to Hong Kong. However, none of the declarations made by China in connection with the handover or later explicitly mentioned the CISG, and it was disputed whether any of the generic clauses in one of China's declarations to the UN Secretary-General could be construed as also referring to the CISG, or as constituting a declaration "equivalent to" the one envisaged by Art. 93(1) CISG.
Against this background, courts from a number of countries had to grapple with the question whether parties from Hong Kong were to be considered parties that had their place of business in a "Contracting State" for the purpose of Art. 1(1)(a) and (b) CISG, or not. Case law addressing this question was divided, both in outcome and in underlying reasoning. It has been summarized on a separate page:
Case law on the status of the Hong Kong SAR under the CISG (1997–2022)
On 4 May 2022, the People's Republic of China then made a declaration to the CISG's depositary providing that the Sales Convention would apply to Hong Kong from 1 December 2022 onwards, thereby removing the uncertainty that existed between 1997 and 2022. For purposes of the Convention's applicability in accordance with Art. 1(1)(a) or (b) CISG, parties with their place of business in the Hong Kong SAR are parties with a place of business in a CISG Contracting State when it comes to sales contracts concluded on or after 1 December 2022.
2020 Consultation on the Proposed Application of the CISG to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
In May 2019, the Hong Kong SAR's Department of Justice announced its intention to conduct a public consultation regarding the explicit extension of the 1980 Sales Convention to Hong Kong.
On 27 May 2019, the Legislative Council's Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the matter and concluded that it in general supported the approach of the proposed application of CISG.
Between 2 March and 30 September 2020, the Hong Kong Department of Justice conducted a public consultation on the proposed application of CISG to the Hong Kong SAR. The consultation was commenced by issuing a comprehensive Consultation Paper, accompanied by a Press Release.
On 22 March 2021, the Legislative Council's Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the outcome of the public consulation.
Department of Justice of Hong Kong, Paper: Proposed Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (March 2021), CB(4)648/20-21(03), 49 pp. (informing the members of the Legislative Council about the outcome of the public consultation, including the full text of most responses to the consultation)
2021 Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance
Taking into account the outcome of the public consultation, the Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill, which aimed to implement the CISG in the Hong Kong SAR, was introduced into the Legislative Council on 14 July 2021.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill
Legislative Council Brief: Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill, File Ref.: IL/ ITF/ 1/ 81
The Bill was passed by the Legislative Council on 29 September 2021, enacting the Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance, Ord. No. 30 of 2021
According to a notice by the Hong Kong Secretary for Justice published in the Gazette, the Ordinance came into operation on 1 December 2022.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance (Commencement) Notice, L.N. 160 of 2022
Published CISG cases adjudicated by courts in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
Published CISG cases worldwide involving parties from the Hong Kong SAR (China):
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court)
Denmark, 23 October 2015 – H-67-14, CISG-online 4309
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court)
Denmark, 23 October 2015 – H-67-14, CISG-online 4309
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Parties from the Hong Kong SAR most frequently settled their CISG disputes in:
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802
河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767
中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965
湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193
上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356
上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731
Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422
Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430
Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141
Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570
Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828
Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074
Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883
Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
Goods most frequently traded under the CISG by buyers and sellers from the Hong Kong SAR:
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477
High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056
广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622
Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995
Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884
Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040
High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381
Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649
Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045
广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651
Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928
中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000
Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937
Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Parties from the Hong Kong SAR were involved in CISG transactions:
CISG decisions by courts in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
CISG decisions in arbitrations administered by institutions based in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
Arbitral awards rendered in arbitrations with seat in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Hong Kong SAR (China), Nov 2006 – CISG/2006/12, CISG-online 1926