CISG by jurisdiction
Admin area
Hong Kong SAR (China)

Status under the CISG:
Contracting State territory
Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China, has without doubt been a CISG Contracting territory since 1 December 2022.
Prior to this date, Hong Kong's status under the CISG was uncertain (see in more detail below).
No reservations are in effect for Hong Kong. In particular, the Art. 95 CISG reservation in effect for the People's Republic of China does not extend to the Hong Kong SAR.
Further information:
Uncertainty regarding Hong Kong's status under the CISG between 1 July 1997 and 30 November 2022
Until 1 December 2022, the status of Hong Kong under the CISG was uncertain. The reasons for this uncertainty, briefly described, were as follows:
Prior to 1 December 2022 Hong Kong was not mentioned, and had never been mentioned, on the official list of CISG Contracting States kept and communicated to States by the Secretary-General of the United Nations in his role as depositary of the Sales Convention in accordance with Art. 89 CISG and Art. 77(1)(e) of the Vienna Convention on the Law Applicable to Treaties (1969).
Until 30 June 1997, Hong Kong had been a British Dependent Territory under the sovereignty of the United Kingdom, a CISG Non-Contracting State. On 1 July 1997, the sovereignty over Hong Kong was transferred to the People's Republic of China through the so-called "handover". Hong Kong became and has since been a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China. The People's Republic of China has been a CISG Contracting State already since 1988. The handover thus resulted in the territory of Hong Kong changing from being part of a CISG Non-Contracting State (UK) to a CISG Contracting State (China). The effects of this somewhat unusual process are not expressly addressed in the 1980 Sales Convention, resulting in uncertainty about Hong Kong's post-handover status under the CISG.
An important point of dispute resulted from the wording of Art. 93 CISG and this provision's applicability, if any, to the status of Hong Kong under the CISG: Art. 93(1) CISG authorizes each Contracting State that has two or more territorial units in which, according to its constitution, different systems of law are applicable in relation to the matters dealt with in this Convention to declare that the Convention is to extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them. Art. 31 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for the establishment of special administrative regions (like the Hong Kong SAR) that arguably qualify as "territorial units" in the sense of Art. 93(1) CISG. Furthermore, under the "one country, two systems" principle, the system of law applicable in the Hong Kong SAR relation to sales contracts is different from the system of law applicable in this regard in the PRC. Accordingly, the argument was made that Art. 93 CISG applied to the pre-2022 post-handover situation regarding Hong Kong. At the same time, the provision has clearly not been drafted with the scenario like the "handover" – a CISG Contracting State's post-accession extension by a territorial unit that did not form part of the State when it became a Contracting State – in mind.
The most significant difficulty raised by Art. 93 CISG's potential application to Hong Kong resulted from Art. 93(4) CISG. This provision reads:
If a Contracting State makes no declaration under paragraph (1) of this article, the Convention is to extend to all territorial units of that State.
Whenever Art. 93 CISG was considered applicable to post-1997 Hong Kong, Art. 93(4) CISG thus by law made the 1980 Sales Convention applicable to the Hong Kong SAR at that time, unless one reached the conclusion that the People's Republic of China had made a declaration to the Convention's depositary declaring that the CISG does not apply to Hong Kong. However, none of the declarations made by China in connection with the handover or later explicitly mentioned the CISG, and it was disputed whether any of the generic clauses in one of China's declarations to the UN Secretary-General could be construed as also referring to the CISG, or as constituting a declaration "equivalent to" the one envisaged by Art. 93(1) CISG.
Against this background, courts from a number of countries had to grapple with the question whether parties from Hong Kong were to be considered parties that had their place of business in a "Contracting State" for the purpose of Art. 1(1)(a) and (b) CISG, or not. Case law addressing this question was divided, both in outcome and in underlying reasoning. It has been summarized on a separate page:
Case law on the status of the Hong Kong SAR under the CISG (1997–2022)
On 4 May 2022, the People's Republic of China then made a declaration to the CISG's depositary providing that the Sales Convention would apply to Hong Kong from 1 December 2022 onwards, thereby removing the uncertainty that existed between 1997 and 2022. For purposes of the Convention's applicability in accordance with Art. 1(1)(a) or (b) CISG, parties with their place of business in the Hong Kong SAR are parties with a place of business in a CISG Contracting State when it comes to sales contracts concluded on or after 1 December 2022.
2020 Consultation on the Proposed Application of the CISG to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
In May 2019, the Hong Kong SAR's Department of Justice announced its intention to conduct a public consultation regarding the explicit extension of the 1980 Sales Convention to Hong Kong.
On 27 May 2019, the Legislative Council's Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the matter and concluded that it in general supported the approach of the proposed application of CISG.
Between 2 March and 30 September 2020, the Hong Kong Department of Justice conducted a public consultation on the proposed application of CISG to the Hong Kong SAR. The consultation was commenced by issuing a comprehensive Consultation Paper, accompanied by a Press Release.
On 22 March 2021, the Legislative Council's Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services discussed the outcome of the public consulation.
Department of Justice of Hong Kong, Paper: Proposed Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (March 2021), CB(4)648/20-21(03), 49 pp. (informing the members of the Legislative Council about the outcome of the public consultation, including the full text of most responses to the consultation)
2021 Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance
Taking into account the outcome of the public consultation, the Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill, which aimed to implement the CISG in the Hong Kong SAR, was introduced into the Legislative Council on 14 July 2021.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill
Legislative Council Brief: Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Bill, File Ref.: IL/ ITF/ 1/ 81
The Bill was passed by the Legislative Council on 29 September 2021, enacting the Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance, Ord. No. 30 of 2021
According to a notice by the Hong Kong Secretary for Justice published in the Gazette, the Ordinance came into operation on 1 December 2022.
Sale of Goods (United Nations Convention) Ordinance (Commencement) Notice, L.N. 160 of 2022
Published CISG cases adjudicated by courts in the Hong Kong SAR (China):

Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391

Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
Published CISG cases worldwide involving parties from the Hong Kong SAR (China):

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157

Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910

Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381

Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943

Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867

Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890

Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690

河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732

Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423

Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494

Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731

Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535

河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866

Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682

Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court)
Denmark, 23 October 2015 – H-67-14, CISG-online 4309

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911

High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652

High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045

Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923

Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803

中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842

山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054

Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130

广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074

湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554

中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383

Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995

Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430

Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129

Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994

湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449

上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592

上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381

Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883

Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649

Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867

Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937

Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494

Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141

Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570

Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535

河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802

河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767

Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040

Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591

Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682

Sø- og Handelsretten (Maritime and Commercial Court)
Denmark, 23 October 2015 – H-67-14, CISG-online 4309

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641

High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477

High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045

Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911

Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803

中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842

山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054

Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580

广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554

中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383

Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430

Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129

Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995

Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994

湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965

湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592

上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356

上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Parties from the Hong Kong SAR most frequently settled their CISG disputes in:

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494

Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 31 December 2019 – [2019/a] (Final Award), CISG-online 5690

Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Arbitration, 05 April 2018 – 2017/058 (Final award), CISG-online 5494

Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 February 2005 – CISG/2005/06, CISG-online 1580

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 December 2003 – CISG/2003/12, CISG-online 1609

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 2000 – [CISG/2000/17], CISG-online 1614

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347

U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 15 August 2022 – 3:22-CV-00248 (KAD), CISG-online 5943

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842

河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802

河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767

中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952

山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108

广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836

湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965

中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383

湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193

上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356

上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107

河南省郑州市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Zhengzhou, Henan Province)
China, 15 May 2019 – (2018) No. 3451 of Henan Province, CISG-online 4802

河南省禹城市县人民法院 (People's Court of Yucheng County, Henan Province)
China, 2018, CISG-online 4767

中华人民共和国浙江省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Zhejiang Province)
China, 15 December 2010 – (2010) Zhe Shang Wai Zhong Zi No. 99, CISG-online 3937

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952

山东省东营市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Dongying, Shandong Province)
China, 12 May 2008 – IPC/38, CISG-online 2108

广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836

中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383

湖北省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Hubei Province)
China, 19 March 2003, CISG-online 1965

湖北省武汉市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People's Court Wuhan, Hubei Province)
China, 2001, CISG-online 2193

上海市第二中级人民法院 (Intermediate People’s Court Shanghai No. 2)
China, 24 November 2000, CISG-online 4356

上海市黄浦区人民院 (People’s Court Shanghai Huangpu District)
China, 30 August 2000 – BPC/05, CISG-online 2107

Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649

Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732

Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649

Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937

Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 07 November 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3732

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 31 January 2018 – C/13/613066 / HA ZA 16-774, CISG-online 3731

Gerechtshof Den Haag (Court of Appeal The Hague)
Netherlands, 18 September 2018 – 200.194.074/01, CISG-online 3423

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 03 February 2016 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 3422

Rechtbank Rotterdam (District Court Rotterdam)
Netherlands, 25 November 2015 – C/10/474075 / HA ZA 15-362, CISG-online 2682

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641

Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911

Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912

Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430

Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129

Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911

Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912

Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 12 November 2001 – 13 U 102/01, CISG-online 1430

Landgericht Bielefeld (District Court Bielefeld)
Germany, 27 March 2001 – 11 O 46/00, CISG-online 3129

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141

Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570

Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622

Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 October 2022 – 20-22.528 / 621 F-B, CISG-online 6141

Cour d'appel de Bordeaux (Court of Appeal Bordeaux)
France, 06 October 2020 – 18/00338, CISG-online 5570

Tribunal de Commerce de Bordeaux (Commercial Court Bordeaux)
France, 09 January 2018 – R.G. 2017F00578, CISG-online 5535

Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045

Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045

Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 24 October 2008 – [2008] FCA 1591 / ACN 087 011 541, CISG-online 1782

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 31 August 2005 – 7 Ob 175/05v, CISG-online 1093

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 01 February 2005 – 1 R 253/04x, CISG-online 1130

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 09 July 2004 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 1129

Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 17 December 2003 – 7 Ob 275/03x, CISG-online 828

Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck (Court of Appeal Innsbruck)
Austria, 03 June 2003 – 1 R 90/03z, CISG-online 3074

Landesgericht Innsbruck (District Court Innsbruck)
Austria, 06 February 2003 – 12 Cg 32/02i, CISG-online 3061

Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883

Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811

Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 December 2023 – 4A_11/2023, CISG-online 6883

Handelsgericht des Kantons Bern/Tribunal de Commerce du Canton de Berne (Commercial Court Canton Bern)
Switzerland, 17 November 2022, CISG-online 6811

Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995

Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994

Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995

Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994
Goods most frequently traded under the CISG by buyers and sellers from the Hong Kong SAR:

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652

High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056

广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 22 May 2014 – 18133/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3652

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 March 2013 – 18592/CA, CISG-online 5477

High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
United Kingdom, 19 December 2013 – 1:15-cv-05292-GBD, CISG-online 6089

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 10 July 2012 – 17195/MLK/ARP, CISG-online 6087

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 09 January 2008 – [CISG/2008/02], CISG-online 2056

广东省高级人民法院 (Higher People's Court Guangdong Province)
China, 2005, CISG-online 1966

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 2005 – (2005) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Chu Zi No. 88, CISG-online 3836

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 11 February 2000 – [CISG/2000/02], CISG-online 1529

Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622

Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044

Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995

Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803

Sąd Rejonowy w Gdyni (Local Court Gdynia)
Poland, 16 February 2018 – VI GC 274/16, CISG-online 6608

Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 03 July 2018 – 16/21302, CISG-online 5622

Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (District Court Paris)
France, 15 September 2016 – 14/11606, CISG-online 5591

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
USA, 20 October 2010 – 3:10-CV-86, CISG-online 2484

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 17 December 2009 – 1:09-CV-547-TWT, CISG-online 2044

Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 14 February 2002 – 2001/AR/551, CISG-online 995

Rechtbank van Koophandel Turnhout (Commercial Court Turnhout)
Belgium, 18 January 2001 – A/00/691, CISG-online 994

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 January 2000 – CISG/2000/10, CISG-online 1803

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157

Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 31 July 2024 – 27550/AB/XZG (Final Award), CISG-online 7157

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 08 October 2023 – 27550/AB/XZG (Procedural Order on Choice of Law), CISG-online 7076

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 09 November 2022 – CV 21-2661-DMG (AFMx), CISG-online 6347

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Kammergericht (Court of Appeal Berlin)
Germany, 01 February 2024 – 2 U 130/21, CISG-online 6910

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 03 September 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6884

Landgericht Berlin (District Court Berlin)
Germany, 30 July 2021 – 94 O 23/20, CISG-online 6867

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 06 December 2000 – [CISG/2000/13], CISG-online 1449

Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040

High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554

Centro de Arbitragem e Mediação Brasil-Canadá (Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAM-CCBC))
Arbitration, 14 November 2016 – 77/2013/SEC3, CISG-online 6040

High Court of the Republic of Singapore
Singapore, 30 October 2014 – [2014] SGHC 220, CISG-online 2564

ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 12 August 2013 – 18848/CYK (Final Award), CISG-online 3127

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 23 March 2007 – CISG/2007/08, CISG-online 2054

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 14 January 2004 – Shen M2003016 / [CISG/2004/01], CISG-online 1452

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 18 July 2002 – CISG/2002/20, CISG-online 1554

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641

Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 21 June 2023 – CV 18-10164-CJC (GSJx), CISG-online 6381

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant (District Court Oost-Brabant)
Netherlands, 04 August 2021 – 355987 HA ZA 21-149, CISG-online 5649

Rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court Amsterdam)
Netherlands, 11 December 2013 – 13-527401 HA ZA 12-1212, CISG-online 4641

Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Germany, 10 August 2015 – 12 U 580/11, CISG-online 2911

Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 29 April 2011 – 15 O 177/10, CISG-online 2912

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 10 August 1999 – [CISG/1999/35], CISG-online 1606

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 02 April 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2093

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 23 December 2009 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2045

广东省深圳市中级人民法院 (Intermediate People‘s Court Shenzhen, Guangdong Province)
China, 30 March 2009 – (2008) Shen Zhong Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No. 101, CISG-online 3952

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842

Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 02 April 2008 – 04-17726, CISG-online 1651

Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Court of Appeal Aix-en-Provence)
France, 01 April 2004, CISG-online 3253

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928

中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 25 May 2005 – CISG/2004/09, CISG-online 1685

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 26 June 2003 – CISG/2003/10, CISG-online 2928

中华人民共和国北海海事法院 (Maritime Court Beihai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region)
China, 05 March 2002 – (2001) Haishangchuzi No.119, CISG-online 1383

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 20 October 2014 – EDCV 14-00038-VAP (DTBx), CISG-online 4000

Federal Court of Australia
Australia, 29 June 2012 – [2012] FCA 691 / NSD 396 of 2012, CISG-online 6045

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 29 September 2000 – CISG/2000/15, CISG-online 1592

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864

Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2866

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division
USA, 11 October 2016 – 143 A.D.3d 491, CISG-online 2865

Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 25 September 2015 – 650040/2012, CISG-online 2864

Supreme Court of New South Wales
Australia, 25 July 2011 – [2011] NSWSC 774 / 10/417017, CISG-online 6923

Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937

Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206

Gerechthof 's-Hertogenbosch (Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch)
Netherlands, 02 August 2022 – 200.298.252/01, CISG-online 5937

Rechtbank Zeeland-West-Brabant (District Court Zeeland-West-Brabant)
Netherlands, 07 April 2021 – C/02/374204 / HA ZA 20-387, CISG-online 5890

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 28 January 1999 – CISG/1999/06, CISG-online 1206
Parties from the Hong Kong SAR were involved in CISG transactions:
CISG decisions by courts in the Hong Kong SAR (China):

Hong Kong Court of First Instance
Hong Kong SAR (China), 13 December 2005 – [2005] HKCU 1771 / HCA 2826/2004, CISG-online 6391
CISG decisions in arbitrations administered by institutions based in the Hong Kong SAR (China):
Arbitral awards rendered in arbitrations with seat in the Hong Kong SAR (China):

China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Hong Kong SAR (China), Nov 2006 – CISG/2006/12, CISG-online 1926