Search for cases

CISG-online number
4463
Case name
Electronic electricity meters case
Jurisdiction
Switzerland
Court
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Chamber
I. zivilrechtliche Abteilung (1st department for civil law matters)
Judges
Christina Kiss (Presiding Judge), Fabienne Hohl (Judge), Kathrin Klett (Judge), Marie-Chantal May Canellas (Judge), Martha Niquille (Judge), Linus Hug (Gerichtsschreiber)
Date of decision
28 May 2019
Case nr./docket nr.
4A_543/2018
Claimant 1
Name
IWB Industrielle Werke Basel
Place of business
Switzerland
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondents 2
Name
Iskraemeco d.d.
Place of business
Slovenia
Role in transaction
Seller
Name
Iskraemeco Schweiz AG
Place of business
Switzerland
Role in transaction
Seller
Case History
Electronic electricity meters case
Zivilgericht Basel-Stadt (Court of First Instance Basel-Stadt)
Switzerland, 26 October 2016 – K5.2015.2, CISG-online 3904
Electronic electricity meters case
Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt (Court of Appeal Canton Basel-Stadt)
Switzerland, 24 August 2018 – ZB.2017.20 (AG.2018.557), CISG-online 3906
reversing
Present decision affirming
Sellers 2
Name
Iskraemeco d.d.
Place of business
Slovenia
Name
Iskraemeco Schweiz AG
Place of business
Switzerland
Buyer 1
Name
IWB Industrielle Werke Basel
Place of business
Switzerland
Category of goods
87: Professional, scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus, not elsewhere specified
Goods as per contract
35,000 electronic electricity meters
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
Swiss law
Key CISG provisions interpreted and applied
Art. 1(2); Art. 4(a) (burden of proof; domestic remedies for mistake not applicable to CISG contracts); Art. 6; Art. 7(1)
Key CISG provisions interpreted
Art. 2(c); Art. 14(1)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 1(1)(a); Art. 3; Art. 8(1); Art. 8(2); Art. 8(3); Art. 14 et seq.; Art. 18(1); Art. 35 et seq.; Art. 35(3); Art. 36(2); Art. 39(2); Art. 45; Art. 49; Art. 51(2); Art. 73; Art. 79(1)
Non-provision-specific issues addressed
Burden of proof; Rescission of contract under domestic law because of party's mistake (error) at contract formation; Selection of seller by public tender
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 31
Lighting control system case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 17 December 2018 – 4A_243/2018, CISG-online 4105
Potato chips plant case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 07 December 2017 – VII ZR 101/14, CISG-online 2961
Italian knitwear case III
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 29 June 2017 – 8 Ob 104/16a, CISG-online 2845
Online auction of photography case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 08 November 2016 – 4A_451/2016, CISG-online 2803
Andy Warhol "New Coke 1985" hand screen print case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 16 December 2015 – 3 Ob 194/15y, CISG-online 2663
Liebherr excavator case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 26 March 2013 – 4A 741/2012, CISG-online 2561
Paprika powder case IV
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 14 February 2012 – 10 Ob 4/12d, CISG-online 2308
Cybernetix S.A. v. CD Systems de Columbia S.A.
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 13 September 2011 – 09-70305, CISG-online 2311
Tonnellerie Ludonnaise SA v. Anthon GmbH & Co. Maschinenfabrik
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 03 November 2009 – T 08-12.399, CISG-online 2004
Boiler case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 02 April 2009 – 8 Ob 125/08b, CISG-online 1889
Pamesa Ceramica v. Yisrael Mendelsohn Ltd.
Supreme Court of Israel
Israel, 17 March 2009 – CA 7833/06, CA 8125/06, CA 8495/06, CISG-online 1980
Used repainted car case
Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Court of Appeal Stuttgart)
Germany, 31 March 2008 – 6 U 220/07, CISG-online 1658
Citroen Type C 5 case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 04 July 2007 – 2 Ob 95/06v, CISG-online 1560
Bruggen Deuren BVBA v. Top Deuren VOF
Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt (Commercial Court Hasselt)
Belgium, 19 April 2006 – A.R. 05/4177, CISG-online 1389
Herbex Produtos S.A. v. Cogemar S.A.
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 25 October 2005 – 99-12.879, CISG-online 1098
Industria Stampoggio e Forgiatura (ISEF) S.r.l. v. Eurotransmission et al.
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 04 October 2005 – 02-15.981, CISG-online 1097
TETA case I
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 05 April 2005 – 4C.474/2004, CISG-online 1012
SO.M.AGRI s.a.s. v. Erzeugerorganisation Marchfeldgemüse GmbH & Co. KG
Tribunale di Padova (District Court Padova)
Italy, 25 February 2004 – 40552, CISG-online 819
Resins case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 19 February 2004 – 4C.307/2003, CISG-online 839
Menthol USP Brand crystals case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 13 January 2004 – 4C.245/2003, CISG-online 838
Montepulciano d'Abruzzo wine case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 04 August 2003 – 4C.103/2003 /lma, CISG-online 804
Milk powder case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 09 January 2002 – VIII ZR 304/00, CISG-online 651
Seafood and meat case
Oberlandesgericht Rostock (Court of Appeal Rostock)
Germany, 10 October 2001 – 6 U 126/00, CISG-online 671
Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
USA, 30 July 2001 – C 01-20230 JW, CISG-online 616
Muller Ecole et Bureau v. Federal Trait
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 June 2001 – Q 99-16.118, CISG-online 598
Romay AG v. Behr France S.a.r.l.
Cour d'appel de Colmar (Court of Appeal Colmar)
France, 12 June 2001 – 1 A 199800359, CISG-online 694
Roland Schmidt GmbH v. Textil-Werke Blumenegg AG
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 22 December 2000 – 4C.296/2000, CISG-online 628
Rhomberg GesmbH & Co. KG v. Ott
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 11 December 2000 – 4C.272/2000/rnd, CISG-online 1319
FCF S.A. v. Adriafil Commerciale S.r.l. (Egyptian cotton case II)
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 15 September 2000 – 4C.105/2000, CISG-online 770
Used printing machines case I
Oberlandesgericht Celle (Court of Appeal Celle)
Germany, 24 May 1995 – 20 U 76/94, CISG-online 152
Hearing implants case
Landgericht Aachen (District Court Aachen)
Germany, 14 May 1993 – 43 O 136/92, CISG-online 86
This decision cites the following CISG-AC Opinion 1
This decision is cited by 5
Punching line case
Bezirksgericht Willisau (Court of First Instance Willisau)
Switzerland, 12 June 2023 – 1A4 18 9, CISG-online 7179
Stolen wheel loader case
Obergericht des Kantons Zug (Court of Appeal Canton Zug)
Switzerland, 23 February 2023 – Z1 2022 6, CISG-online 6313
Stolen wheel loader case
Kantonsgericht Zug (Court of First Instance Canton Zug)
Switzerland, 24 February 2022 – A3 2019 27, CISG-online 6285
PET rolls case
Kantonsgericht Zug (Court of First Instance Canton Zug)
Switzerland, 10 December 2020 – A3 2019 9, CISG-online 5926
Shoes case III
Bezirksgericht Höfe (Court of First Instance Höfe)
Switzerland, 04 July 2019 – ZGO 2017 13, CISG-online 5810
Decision published in 2
145 Entscheidungen des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts (BGE) III, 383–391 [Text (excerpt) – in German]
Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2019), 236–244 [Full text – in German]
CLOUT number
1980
Comments on this decision 9
Christoph Brunner, Dario Galli & Markus Vischer, 'Die Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichts zum Kaufvertragsrecht im Jahr 2019', Jusletter (7. Dezember 2020), at no. 1–20 [– in German]
Marion Chautard, 'L’applicabilité de la CVIM faute d’opting-out', LawInside Droit des contrats (21 août 2019), 1–3 [– in French]  
Darius Galli & Markus Vischer, 'Anwendbarkeit des CISG auch bei einem Irrtum über Eigenschaften des Kaufgegenstands', CJN (Commentaire de jurisprudence numérique) / dRSK (Digitaler Rechtsprechungs-Kommentar) (27. Januar 2020) [– in German]  
Thomas Koller, '„Ansprüche im Zusammenhang mit der vertraglichen Beschaffenheit des Kaufobjekts“ im Spannungsfeld zwischen UN-Kaufrecht (CISG) und nationalem Recht', Jusletter (11. Mai 2020) [– in German]  
Pascal Pichonnaz, 'Le point sur la partie générale du droit des obligations/Entwicklungen im Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil: Période de février 2019 à février 2020', 116 Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung (SJZ) / Revue Suisse de Jurisprudence (RSJ) (2020), 272–277, at 275–276 [– in French]
Jörg Schmid, 'Die privatrechtliche Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichts im Jahr 2019 - Obligationenrecht', Zeitschrift des Bernischen Juristenvereins / Revue de la société des juristes bernois (ZBJV) (2020), 677–700 [– in German]
Ulrich G. Schroeter, 'Irrtumsanfechtung nach nationalem Recht und Anforderungen an Ausschlussvereinbarungen bei Anwendbarkeit des UN-Kaufrechts (CISG): Zugleich Anmerkung zu Schweizerisches Bundesgericht, 28.5.2019 – 4A_543/2018', Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2019), 231–235 [– in German]  
Ulrich G. Schroeter, Internationales UN-Kaufrecht, 7th ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (2022), at no. 214 [– in German]
Jacques de Werra, 'Swiss Commercial Contracts: Review of Recent Case Law', Jusletter (9. Dezember 2019), 1–16, at no. 18–22 [– in English]  
Full text and abstract of decision 2