Search for cases

CISG-online number
5633
Case name
Minh Dung Aluminum Company, Ltd v. Aluminum Alloys MFG LLC
Jurisdiction
USA
Court
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Judge
Yvette Kane (District Judge)
Date of decision
02 August 2021
Case nr./docket nr.
1:20-cv-01764
Claimant 1
Name
Minh Dung Aluminum Company, Ltd
Place of business
Vietnam
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondent 1
Name
Aluminum Alloys MFG LLC
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Seller
Seller 1
Name
Aluminum Alloys MFG LLC
Place of business
USA
Buyer 1
Name
Minh Dung Aluminum Company, Ltd
Place of business
Vietnam
Category of goods
68: Non-ferrous metals
Goods as per contract
Aluminum ingots
Price
118'978.20 USD (U.S. Dollar)
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
Key CISG provisions interpreted and applied
Art. 74
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 45
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 4
Profi-Parkiet sp. z o.o. v. Seneca Hardwoods LLC
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
USA, 23 May 2014 – 13 CV 4358 (PKC)(LB), CISG-online 2924
Dingxi Longhai Dairy, Ltd. v. Becwood Technology Group L.L.C.
U.S. Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
USA, 14 February 2011 – 10-2612, CISG-online 2256
Standard Bent Glass Corp. v. Glassrobots Oy
U.S. Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
USA, 20 June 2003 – 02-2169, CISG-online 810
Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S.A. v. Hearthside Baking Comp.
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 19 November 2002 – 01-3402, 02-1867, 02-1915, CISG-online 684
This decision is cited by 1
Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal A.S. v. International Technology & Knowledge Co.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
USA, 29 January 2025 – 2:19-608, CISG-online 7271
Editorial remark
by Ulrich G. Schroeter

The present decision shows a convincing application of the rules of Art. 74 CISG about the amount of damages recoverable under the CISG. A Vietnamese buyer (Minh Dung Aluminum Company; the Claimant) had purchased aluminum alloys from a U.S. seller (Aluminum Alloys MFG; the Respondent), making a downpayment for a part of the price. When the delivery arrived in Vietnam, the containers turned out not to be filled with aluminum alloys, but with hazardous waste. The buyer sued for damages.

In the present decision, the District Court ruled that the following losses were recoverable as damages under Art. 74 CISG, because they were both caused by the seller‘s breach of contract and foreseeable to him: (1) the downpayment the buyer had made; (2) the storage costs the buyer had been forced to pay to store the hazardous waste at Haiphong Port (Vietnam); (3) lost profits suffered by the buyer.

By contrast, the District Court ruled that (4) costs and fees for filing the claim, for „legal research“ and of serving process on the Respondent could not be recovered under Art. 74 CISG, citing the Zapata decision (CISG-online 684) about the non-recoverability of attorneys‘ fees in support.

Decision published in 1
2021 Westlaw (WL) 3219686 [Full text – in English]
CLOUT number
1962
Comment on this decision 1
Candace M. Zierdt & Kristen David Adams, 'CISG', 77 Business Lawyer (Bus. Law.) (Fall 2022), 1345–1356, at 1349–1350 [– in English]  
Full text and abstract of decision 2
Creator of abstract
Sam Walker
Full text of decision