Search for cases

CISG-online number
6570
Case name
SKD TRADE, a.s. v. RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Jurisdiction
Czech Republic
Court
Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Supreme Court of the Czech Republic)
Judges
JUDr. Miroslav Gallus (Presiding Judge), JUDr. Hana Gajdzioková (Judge), Mgr. Jirí Němec (Judge)
Date of decision
29 April 2020
Case nr./docket nr.
32 Cdo 974/2020
Claimant 1
Name
SKD TRADE, a.s.
Place of business
Czech Republic
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondent 1
Name
RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Place of business
Slovak Republic
Role in transaction
Seller
Case History
SKD TRADE, a.s. v. RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9 (Local Court Prague 9)
Czech Republic, 05 June 2015 – 52 C 248/2014-71, CISG-online 6818
decision on jurisdiction
SKD TRADE, a.s. v. RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Městský soud v Praze (Municipal Court Prague)
Czech Republic, 18 August 2015 – 93 Co 136/2015-97, CISG-online 6871
affirming
SKD TRADE, a.s. v. RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Supreme Court of the Czech Republic)
Czech Republic, 25 April 2017 – 30 Cdo 5535/2015, CISG-online 6887
affirming
SKD TRADE, a.s. v. RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9 (Local Court Prague 9)
Czech Republic, 25 June 2019 – 52 C 248/2014, CISG-online 6500
decision on merits
SKD TRADE, a.s. v. RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Městský soud v Praze (Municipal Court Prague)
Czech Republic, 20 November 2019 – 39 Co 329/2019-411, CISG-online 6542
affirming in part, reversing in part
Present decision affirming
Seller 1
Name
RUDOS RUŽOMBEROK, s.r.o.
Place of business
Slovak Republic
Buyer 1
Name
SKD TRADE, a.s.
Place of business
Czech Republic
Category of goods
77: Electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, not elsewhere specified, and electrical parts thereof (including non- electrical counterparts, not elsewhere specified, of electrical household-type equipment)
Goods as per contract
102 complete and new connecting rods (ID number 2 – 4 V – 8120 – 004, catalogue number 24 V 8120004), packed in boxes, with accompanying documents
CISG applied
no, because the appeal was declared inadmissible on the points raised
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 39(1); Art. 39(2); Art. 40
European Case Law Identifier (ECLI)
ECLI:CZ:NS:2020:32.CDO.974.2020.1
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision
Original language: Czech