Search for cases

CISG-online number
6606
Case name
Schubert Partner v. Eierveiling Poederlee BVBA
Jurisdiction
Belgium
Court
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Chamber
Kamer B4 (Chamber B4)
Judges
B. Bullynck (Presiding Judge), C. Janseghers (Judge), S. Granata (Judge), P. Thijs (Griffier)
Date of decision
13 November 2017
Case nr./docket nr.
2016/AR/1429
Claimant 1
Name
Eierveiling Poederlee BVBA
Place of business
Belgium
Role in transaction
Seller
Respondent 1
Name
Schubert Partner
Place of business
Czech Republic
Role in transaction
Buyer
Case History
Eierveiling Poederlee BVBA v. Schubert Partner
Rechtbank van Koophandel Antwerpen (Commercial Court Antwerp)
Belgium, 21 April 2016 – A/15/2243, CISG-online 6473
Present decision
Schubert Partner v. Eierveiling Poederlee BVBA
Hof van Beroep Antwerpen (Court of Appeal Antwerp)
Belgium, 18 February 2019 – 2016/AR/1429, CISG-online 4992
Seller 1
Name
Eierveiling Poederlee BVBA
Place of business
Belgium
Buyer 1
Name
Schubert Partner
Place of business
Czech Republic
Role in trade
Dealer / Trader
Category of goods
2: Dairy products and birds' eggs
Goods as per contract
604,800 fresh chicken eggs, class A
Price
42'616.00 EUR (Euro)
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
Belgian law
Key CISG provisions interpreted
Art. 7(2)
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 38(1)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 4; Art. 11; Art. 19(2); Art. 21(2); Art. 26; Art. 39(1); Art. 48(2); Art. 65; Art. 71(3); Art. 80
Relevant CISG provisions not cited
Art. 35(1)
Non-provision-specific issues addressed
Burden of proof; Duty to inform the other party; Role of good faith in CISG cases
This decision is cited by 1
Frigera N.V. v. D.E.C. S.r.l.
Parket bij het Hof van Cassatie/Parquet près la Cour de Cassation (Advocate General at the Belgian Supreme Court)
Belgium, 06 June 2024 – C.23.0431.N, CISG-online 7066
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision
Original language: Dutch