Search for cases
CISG-online number
342
Case name
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino S.p.A.
Jurisdiction
USA
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
Judges
Peter T. Fay (Senior District Judge), James Larry Edmondson (Circuit Judge), Stanley F. Birch (Circuit Judge, reporting)
Date of decision
29 June 1998
Case nr./docket nr.
97-4250
Claimant 1
Name
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc.
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Buyer

Respondent 1
Name
Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino S.p.A.
Place of business
Italy
Role in transaction
Seller

Case History

MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino S.p.A.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 14 February 1994 – 92-2108 CIV, CISG-online 3295
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 14 February 1994 – 92-2108 CIV, CISG-online 3295
Present decision reversing and remanding
Seller 1
Name
Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino S.p.A.
Place of business
Italy
Role in trade
Manufacturer of the goods sold

Buyer 1
Name
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc.
Place of business
USA
Role in trade
Dealer / Trader

Category of goods
66: Non-metallic mineral manufactures, not elsewhere specified
Goods as per contract
Ceramic tiles
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 7; Art. 8 (parol evidence rule and the CISG)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 11; Art. 39; Art. 50
Non-provision-specific issues addressed
Preemption of parol evidence rule
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 3

Delchi Carrier, SpA v. Rotorex Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 06 December 1995 – 95-7182, 95-7186, CISG-online 140
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 06 December 1995 – 95-7182, 95-7186, CISG-online 140

Beijing Metals & Minerals Import/Export Corp. v. American Business Center, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
USA, 15 June 1993 – 92-2171, CISG-online 89
U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
USA, 15 June 1993 – 92-2171, CISG-online 89

Filanto S.p.A. v. Chilewich Int'l Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 14 April 1992 – 91 CIV 3253 (CLB), CISG-online 45
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 14 April 1992 – 91 CIV 3253 (CLB), CISG-online 45
This decision is cited by 39

Garage Door Systems, LLC v. Blue Giant Equipment Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 11 April 2025 – 24-2136, CISG-online 7365
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 11 April 2025 – 24-2136, CISG-online 7365

Kumpers Composites GmbH & Co KG v. TPI Composites Inc.
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
USA, 25 February 2025 – CV-23-00214-PHX-SMB, CISG-online 7294
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
USA, 25 February 2025 – CV-23-00214-PHX-SMB, CISG-online 7294

Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal A.S. v. International Technology & Knowledge Co.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
USA, 29 January 2025 – 2:19-608, CISG-online 7271
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
USA, 29 January 2025 – 2:19-608, CISG-online 7271

THI Medical, S.A.C. v. Filmore Management Trading, LLC et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 23 August 2023 – 21-21632-Civ-GAYLES/TORRES, CISG-online 6489
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 23 August 2023 – 21-21632-Civ-GAYLES/TORRES, CISG-online 6489

Trinity Metals LLC v. Shred-Tech North America et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
USA, 06 September 2022 – 1:21-cv-02876-RLY-DML, CISG-online 6258
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
USA, 06 September 2022 – 1:21-cv-02876-RLY-DML, CISG-online 6258

Shenzen Synergy Digital Co., Ltd. v. Mingtel, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USA, 29 March 2022 – 4:19-cv-00216, CISG-online 5845
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USA, 29 March 2022 – 4:19-cv-00216, CISG-online 5845

New York State Dept. of Health v. Rusi Technology Co., Ltd.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781

Transmar Commodity Group Ltd. v. Cooperativa Agraria Industrial Naranjillo Ltda.
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 09 May 2018 – 16-3532-cv, CISG-online 3060
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 09 May 2018 – 16-3532-cv, CISG-online 3060

Mado Holdings, LLC v. Jinming Wu et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 22 September 2017 – 1:17-CV-1358-MHC, CISG-online 3403
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 22 September 2017 – 1:17-CV-1358-MHC, CISG-online 3403

Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 31 March 2017 – 15 C 2207, CISG-online 2827
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 31 March 2017 – 15 C 2207, CISG-online 2827

Skelton Truck Lines, Ltd. v. PeopleNet Communications Corp. et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
USA, 18 January 2017 – 16-46 (JRT/JSM), CISG-online 5491
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
USA, 18 January 2017 – 16-46 (JRT/JSM), CISG-online 5491

GPS Granite Ltda v. Ultimate Granite, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
USA, 05 October 2016 – 8:16-cv-775-T-30AAS, CISG-online 2855
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
USA, 05 October 2016 – 8:16-cv-775-T-30AAS, CISG-online 2855

Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 29 August 2016 – 15-cv-2207, CISG-online 2929
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 29 August 2016 – 15-cv-2207, CISG-online 2929

VLM Food Trading Int'l, Inc. v. Illinois Trading Comp. et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 21 January 2016 – 14-2776, CISG-online 2811
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 21 January 2016 – 14-2776, CISG-online 2811

Orica Australia Pty Ltd v. Aston Evaporative Services, LLC
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
USA, 28 July 2015 – 14-cv-0412-WJM-CBS, CISG-online 2661
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
USA, 28 July 2015 – 14-cv-0412-WJM-CBS, CISG-online 2661

Urica, Inc. v. Pharmaplast S.A.E.
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 08 August 2014 – CV 11-02476 MMM RZX, CISG-online 2952
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 08 August 2014 – CV 11-02476 MMM RZX, CISG-online 2952

Allied Dynamics Corp. v. Kennametal, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
USA, 05 August 2014 – 12-CV-5904 (JFB)(AKT), CISG-online 2950
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
USA, 05 August 2014 – 12-CV-5904 (JFB)(AKT), CISG-online 2950

Weihai Textile Group v. Level 8 Apparel, LLC et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 28 March 2014 – 11 Civ. 4405(ALC)(FM), CISG-online 2923
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 28 March 2014 – 11 Civ. 4405(ALC)(FM), CISG-online 2923

Eligere Carpet & Rugs, LLC et al. v. Filature Lemieux, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 22 January 2013 – 4:12-CV-0236-HLM, CISG-online 6687
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 22 January 2013 – 4:12-CV-0236-HLM, CISG-online 6687

Shanghai Fortune Chemical Co. et al. v. PMC Specialties Grp. Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 20 March 2012 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 7255
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 20 March 2012 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 7255

Al Hewar v. Southeast Ranch, LL.C.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 08 November 2011 – 10-80851-CV-HURLEY/HOPKINS, CISG-online 4064
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 08 November 2011 – 10-80851-CV-HURLEY/HOPKINS, CISG-online 4064

Al Hewar v. Southeast Ranch, LL.C.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 07 November 2011 – 10-80851, CISG-online 2241
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 07 November 2011 – 10-80851, CISG-online 2241

Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co., Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 28 September 2011 – 06 Civ. 3972 (LTS)(JCF), CISG-online 2338
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 28 September 2011 – 06 Civ. 3972 (LTS)(JCF), CISG-online 2338

Alpha Prime Development Co. v. Holland Loader Co.
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
USA, 06 July 2010 – 09-cv-01763-WYD-KMT, CISG-online 2111
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
USA, 06 July 2010 – 09-cv-01763-WYD-KMT, CISG-online 2111

Belcher-Robinson, L.L.C. v. Linamar Corp. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
USA, 31 March 2010 – 3:09-cv-131-MEF, CISG-online 2092
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
USA, 31 March 2010 – 3:09-cv-131-MEF, CISG-online 2092

ECEM European Chemical Marketing BV v. The Purolite Comp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
USA, 29 January 2010 – 05-3078, CISG-online 2090
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
USA, 29 January 2010 – 05-3078, CISG-online 2090

Israeli v. Dott. Gallina S.r.l. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
USA, 07 July 2009 – 09-cv-20-bbc, CISG-online 1962
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
USA, 07 July 2009 – 09-cv-20-bbc, CISG-online 1962

Miami Valley Paper, LLC v. Lebbing Engineering & Consulting GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 26 March 2009 – 1:05-CV-00702, CISG-online 1880
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 26 March 2009 – 1:05-CV-00702, CISG-online 1880

Caffaro Chimica S.r.l. et al. v. Sipcam Agro USA et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 15 July 2008 – 1:07-CV-2471-MHS, CISG-online 5529
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 15 July 2008 – 1:07-CV-2471-MHS, CISG-online 5529

Guang Dong Light Headgear Factory Co. Ltd. v. ACI International Inc.
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas
USA, 28 September 2007 – 03-4165-JAR, CISG-online 1602
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas
USA, 28 September 2007 – 03-4165-JAR, CISG-online 1602

TeeVee Toons, Inc. v. Gerhard Schubert GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 23 August 2006 – 00 Civ. 5189 (RCC), CISG-online 1272
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 23 August 2006 – 00 Civ. 5189 (RCC), CISG-online 1272

Treibacher Industrie AG v. TDY Industries, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
USA, 27 April 2005 – CV-01-HS-2872-NE, CISG-online 1178
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
USA, 27 April 2005 – CV-01-HS-2872-NE, CISG-online 1178

Geneva Pharmaceuticals Technology Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 10 May 2002 – 99CIV3607(RWS), CISG-online 653
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 10 May 2002 – 99CIV3607(RWS), CISG-online 653

Usinor Industeel v. Leeco Steel Products, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 28 March 2002 – 02 C 0540, CISG-online 696
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 28 March 2002 – 02 C 0540, CISG-online 696

Shuttle Packaging Systems, L.L.C. v. Jacob Tsonakis, INA S.A. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
USA, 17 December 2001 – 1:01-CV-691, CISG-online 773
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
USA, 17 December 2001 – 1:01-CV-691, CISG-online 773

Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S.A. v. Hearthside Baking Comp.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 28 August 2001 – 99 C 4040, CISG-online 599
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 28 August 2001 – 99 C 4040, CISG-online 599

Supermicro Computer Inc. v. Digitechnic, S.A.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
USA, 30 January 2001 – C-00-02214-CAL, CISG-online 612
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
USA, 30 January 2001 – C-00-02214-CAL, CISG-online 612

Magellan Int'l Corporation v. Salzgitter Handel GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 07 December 1999 – 99 C 5153, CISG-online 439
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 07 December 1999 – 99 C 5153, CISG-online 439

Mitchell Aircraft Spares, Inc. v. European Aircraft Service AB
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 27 October 1998 – 97 C 5668, CISG-online 444
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 27 October 1998 – 97 C 5668, CISG-online 444
Decision published in 2
144 Federal Reporter, Third Series (F.3d) 1384–1393 [Full text – in English]
1998 Westlaw (WL) 343335 [Full text – in English]
CLOUT number
222
Case identifier in the old Albert H. Kritzer Database
980629u1
Comments on this decision 16
Rod N. Andreason, 'MCC-Marble Ceramic Center: The Parol Evidence Rule and Other Domestic Law Under the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods', Brigham Young University Law Review (BYU L. Rev.) (1999), 351–381 [– in English]
Peter J. Calleo, 'The inapplicability of the parol evidence rule to the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods', 26 Hofstra Law Review (Hofstra L. Rev.) (2000), 799–833 [– in English]
Karen Halverson Cross, 'Parol Evidence Under the CISG: The "Homeward Trend" Reconsidered', 68 Ohio State Law Journal (Ohio St. L.J.) (2007), 133–160 [– in English]
Harry M. Flechtner, 'The U.N. Sales Convention (CISG) and MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino, S.p.A.: The Eleventh Circuit Weighs in on Interpretation, Subjective Intent, Procedural Limits to the Convention's Scope, and the Parol Evidence Rule', 18 Journal of Law & Commerce (J.L. & Com.) (1999), 259–287 [– in English]
Sunil R. Harjani, 'The Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods in United States Courts', 23 Houston Journal of International Law (Hous. J. Int'l L.) (2004), 49–85, at 73–76 [– in English]
Monica Kilian, 'CISG and the Problem with Common Law Jurisdictions', 10 Journal of Transnational Law and Policy (J. Transnat'l L. & Policy) (2001), 217–243, at 231–233 [– in English]
Jee J. Kim, 'MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuovo d'Agostino, S.p.A., 144 F.3d 1384 (11th Cir. 1998): Federal Courts Required to Examine Parol Evidence when Interpreting Contracts Governed by the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)', 12 New York International Law Review (N.Y. Int'l L. Rev.) (1999), 105–110 [– in English]
Michael J. Kolosky, 'Beyond Partisan Policy: The Eleventh Circuit Lays Aside the Parol Evidence Rule in Pursuit of International Uniformity in Commercial Regulation', 24 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commerce Regulation (N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg.) (1998), 199–219 [– in English]
Marlyse McQuillen, 'The Development of a Federal CISG Common Law in U.S. Courts: Patterns of Interpretation and Citation', 61 University of Miami Law Review (U. Miami L. Rev.) (2007), 509–537, at 521–522 [– in English]
Mark A. Mintz, 'The Seventh Amendment and the CISG: Functional Factors in the Search for a Jury Trial Right', 6 DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal (DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J.) (2007), 143–162, at 160–161 [– in English]
Marie-France Papandréou-Deterville, Recueil Dalloz (D.) (1999), Somm., 367–369 [– in French]
James P. Quinn, 'The Interpretation and Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods', 9 International Trade and Business Law Review (ITBLR) (2004), 221–241, at 238–239 [– in English]
Donald J. Smythe, 'Reasonable Standards for Contract Interpretations under the CISG', 25 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L.) (2016), 1–28, at 10 [– in English]
Paolo Torzilli, 'The Aftermath of MCC-Marble: Is this the Death Knell for the Parol Evidence Rule?', 74 St. John's Law Review (2000), 843–873 [– in English]
Michael P. Van Alstine, 'The Unified Field Solution to the Battle of the Forms Under the U.N. Sales Convention', 62 William & Mary Law Review (Wm. & Mary L. Rev.) (2020), 213–286, at 255–256 [– in English]
Fan Yang, 'CISG, CIETAC Arbitration and the Rule of Law in the P.R. of China: A Global Jurisconsultorium Perspective', in: Camilla Baasch Andersen & Ulrich G. Schroeter (eds.), Sharing International Commercial Law across National Boundaries: Festschrift for Albert H. Kritzer on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday, London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill (2008), 600–626, at 620–621 [– in English]
Full text and abstract of decision 2
Abstract of decision
Full text of decision