Search for cases

CISG-online number
730
Case name
BP Oil International, Ltd. v. Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador (PetroEcuador)
Jurisdiction
USA
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Judges
Jerry E. Smith (Circuit Judge), Rhesa H. Barksdale (Circuit Judge), Sidney A. Fitzwater (District Judge)
Date of decision
11 June 2003
Case nr./docket nr.
02-20166
Claimants 2
Name
BP Oil International, Ltd.
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Seller
Name
BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.
Place of business
USA
Respondents 2
Name
Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador (PetroEcuador)
Place of business
Ecuador
Role in transaction
Buyer
Name
Saybolt, Inc.
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Company responsible for testing the goods at the port of departure
Case History
BP Oil International, Ltd. v. Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador (PetroEcuador)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 09 November 2001 – 99-1475, CISG-online 3296
Present decision reversing and remanding in part, affirming in part
Seller 1
Name
BP Oil International, Ltd.
Place of business
USA
Role in trade
Dealer / Trader
Buyer 1
Name
Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador (PetroEcuador)
Place of business
Ecuador
Category of goods
33: Petroleum, petroleum products and related materials
Goods as per contract
140,000 barrels of unleaded gasoline
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
Ecuador law
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 6; Art. 9(2); Art. 36(1); Art. 39(1); Art. 40
Legal issues regarding Incoterms addressed
Effect on seller's obligations under a CISG contract; Effect on the passing of risk
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 4
Ajax Tool Works, Inc. v. Can-Eng Manufacturing Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 29 January 2003 – 01 C 5938, CISG-online 772
St. Paul Guardian Ins. Comp. v. Neuromed Medical Sys. & Support GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 26 March 2002 – 00-Civ934 (SHS), CISG-online 615
Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
USA, 30 July 2001 – C 01-20230 JW, CISG-online 616
Delchi Carrier, SpA v. Rotorex Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 06 December 1995 – 95-7182, 95-7186, CISG-online 140
This decision is cited by 59
Kumpers Composites GmbH & Co KG v. TPI Composites Inc.
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
USA, 25 February 2025 – CV-23-00214-PHX-SMB, CISG-online 7294
Fundiciones Balaguer, S.A. v. Ferrell-Ross Roll Mfg.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 17 December 2024 – 4:23-cv-4437, CISG-online 7229
Brands International Corporation v. Reach Companies, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
USA, 30 May 2024 – 23-2164, CISG-online 7006
Chilean Sea Bass Inc. v. Kendell Seafood Imports, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island
USA, 22 May 2024 – 21-cv-337-JJM-LDA, CISG-online 6990
NF Smith & Associates, L.P. v. Karl Kruse GmbH & Co. KG
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 10 October 2023 – 4:22-CV-3877, CISG-online 6627
Ningbo S-Chande Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. Allied Technology, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
USA, 30 September 2023 – 20-10190, CISG-online 6504
Shenzen Synergy Digital Co., Ltd. v. Mingtel, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
USA, 18 July 2023 – 22-40440, CISG-online 6392
Busrel Inc. v. Dotton et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
USA, 01 November 2022 – 1:20-cv-01767, CISG-online 6111
Dongguan Jianqun Shoes Company, Ltd. v. Consolidated Shoe Company, Inc. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
USA, 29 September 2022 – 6:21-cv-00048, CISG-online 6092
MVP Enterprises L.L.C. v. Maratek Environmental Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
USA, 03 June 2022 – 5:21-CV-00138-KDB-DSC, CISG-online 5911
Shenzen Synergy Digital Co., Ltd. v. Mingtel, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USA, 29 March 2022 – 4:19-cv-00216, CISG-online 5845
CoorsTek Korea Ltd. v. Loomis Products Company
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
USA, 17 February 2022 – 21-5168, CISG-online 5793
Strategy Enterprises Ltd. v. Zigi USA, LLC
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 29 December 2021 – 21-23965-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres, CISG-online 5759
Hefei Ziking Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. v. Meever & Meever et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 20 September 2021 – 4:20-CV-00425, CISG-online 5685
Zodiac Seats US LLC v. Synergy Aerospace Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USA, 08 April 2020 – 4:17-cv-00410, CISG-online 5172
Sunrise Foods Int'l, Inc. v. Ryan Hinton Inc.
U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho
USA, 08 August 2019 – 1:17-CV-00457-CWD, CISG-online 4522
Zodiac Seats US LLC v. Synergy Aerospace Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USA, 23 April 2019 – 4:17-cv-00410-ALM-KPJ, CISG-online 4234
Zodiac Seats US LLC v. Synergy Aerospace Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USA, 05 February 2019 – 4:17-cv-00410-ALM-KPJ, CISG-online 4229
McNevin Co. v. Camus Hydronics Ltd.
District Court of the State of Colorado, Arapahoe County
USA, 21 February 2017 – 2016CV30549, CISG-online 4647
Yosemite Auto (Shanghai) Co. v. JRS Metals, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 23 August 2016 – 4:15-CV-1641, CISG-online 2860
Custom Polymers PET, LLC v. Gamma Meccanica SpA
U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina
USA, 03 May 2016 – 6:15-04882-MGL, CISG-online 2902
Rienzi & Sons, Inc. v. Puglisi
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 10 February 2016 – 15-791-cv, CISG-online 2815
Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. v. JTL Machine, Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
USA, 27 January 2016 – 1:14-CV-1774, CISG-online 2906
ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical Prods. GmbH v. Energy Coal, S.p.A.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
USA, 14 October 2015 – 653938/14, CISG-online 2793
Asia Telco Technologies v. Brightstar Int'l Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
USA, 20 August 2015 – 15-20608-Civ-Scola, CISG-online 3056
Luvata Grenada, LLC v. Danfoss, LLC et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
USA, 02 June 2015 – 4:14-CV-00074-SA-JMV, CISG-online 2857
Honey Holdings I, Ltd. v. Alfred L. Wolff, Inc. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 23 January 2015 – G-14-0240, CISG-online 2856
Martini e Ricci Iamino S.p.A. v. Western Market Services, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
USA, 17 September 2014 – 1:13-CV-0097 AWI BAM, CISG-online 3802
Urica, Inc. v. Pharmaplast S.A.E.
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 08 August 2014 – CV 11-02476 MMM RZX, CISG-online 2952
Martini e Ricci Iamino S.p.A. v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
USA, 02 July 2014 – 1:13-CV-276 AWI SAB, CISG-online 2949
Business Mobility Systems, Inc. v. Fibernetics Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan
USA, 14 April 2014 – 1:13-cv-1224, CISG-online 6447
Global Material Technologies, Inc. v. Dazheng Metal Fibre Co.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 20 March 2014 – 12-cv-01851, CISG-online 2486
Roser Technologies, Inc. v. Carl Schreiber GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
USA, 10 September 2013 – 11cv302 ERIE, CISG-online 2490
CITGO Petroleum Corp. v. Odfjell Seachem et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 23 May 2013 – H-07-2950, CISG-online 5175
Laktapol Int’l, Sp. z o.o. et al. v. Bassett & Walker Int’l, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
USA, 10 January 2013 – EP-12-CA-16-FM, CISG-online 4660
Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co., Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 28 September 2011 – 06 Civ. 3972 (LTS)(JCF), CISG-online 2338
Goodview Electronic (Nanjing) Co., Ltd. v. Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 25 April 2011 – SACV 09-00530-CJC(ANx), CISG-online 4657
Shanghai Fortune Chemical Co. et al. v. PMC Specialties Grp. Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
USA, 11 March 2011 – 1:10cv449, CISG-online 3803
Riccitelli v. Elemar New England Marble & Granite, LLC
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut
USA, 11 September 2010 – 3:08CV01783(DJS), CISG-online 3247
Forestal Guarani S.A. v. Daros Int'l, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
USA, 21 July 2010 – 08-4488, CISG-online 2112
ECEM European Chemical Marketing BV v. The Purolite Comp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
USA, 29 January 2010 – 05-3078, CISG-online 2090
Sino Century Development Ltd. et al. v. Anatomic Global, Inc. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
USA, 31 July 2009 – CV 09-03749-RGK (JWJx), CISG-online 4666
Used car case II
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 02 April 2009 – 28 U 107/08, CISG-online 1978
Forestal Guarani, S.A. v. Daros Int'l, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
USA, 07 October 2008 – 03-4821 JAG, CISG-online 1779
CNA Int'l, Inc. v. Guangdong Kelon Electronical Holdings et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 03 September 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 2043
Caffaro Chimica S.r.l. et al. v. Sipcam Agro USA et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
USA, 15 July 2008 – 1:07-CV-2471-MHS, CISG-online 5529
CNA Int’l, Inc. v. Guangdong Kelon Electronical Holdings et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 17 June 2008 – 05 C 5734, CISG-online 4842
Novelis Corp. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
USA, 22 May 2008 – 1:06-CV-2257, CISG-online 1772
Easom Automation Systems, Inc. v. ThyssenKrupp Fabco, Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
USA, 25 April 2008 – 06-14553, CISG-online 4574
Sky Cast, Inc. v. Global Direct Distribution, LLC
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
USA, 18 March 2008 – 07-161-JBT, CISG-online 1652
Atlantic Tool & Die Company v. Klein Umformtechnik GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
USA, 20 February 2008 – 1:07CV1730, CISG-online 6693
Easom Automation Systems, Inc. v. ThyssenKrupp Fabco, Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
USA, 28 September 2007 – 06-14553, CISG-online 1601
Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co., Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 19 July 2007 – 06 Civ. 3972 (LTS) (JCF), CISG-online 1509
Orthotec, LLC v. Eurosurgical, S.A.
Court of Appeal of the State of California (2nd District)
USA, 27 June 2007 – B179387, B189213, CISG-online 4712
Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Canada Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
USA, 31 January 2007 – Civ. 04-4386 ADM/AJB, CISG-online 1435
China North Chemical Industries Corp. v. Beston Chemical Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USA, 07 February 2006 – Civ. A. H-04-0912, CISG-online 1177
American Mint LLC et al. v. GoSoftware, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
USA, 06 January 2006 – Civ.A. 1:05-CV-650, CISG-online 1175
American Mint LLC et al. v. GoSoftware, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
USA, 16 August 2005 – Civ.A. 1:05-CV-650, CISG-online 1104
Valero Marketing & Supply Co. v. Greeni Oy
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
USA, 15 June 2005 – 01-5254 (DRD), CISG-online 1028
Decision published in 1
332 Federal Reporter, Third Series (F.3d) 333
CLOUT number
575
Case identifier in the old Albert H. Kritzer Database
030611u1
Comments on this decision 5
Yehya Badr, 'Going Hybrid: How Hybrid Choice of Law Clauses Can Save the CISG', 41 Journal of Law & Commerce (J.L. & Com.) (2022), 73–101, at 91 [– in English]  
Morten M. Fogt, 'The Knowledge Test Under the CISG – A Global Threefold Distinction of Negligence, Gross Negligence and De Facto Knowledge', 34 Journal of Law & Commerce (J.L. & Com.) (2015), 23–111, at 78–79 [– in English]  
William P. Johnson, 'Analysis of Incoterms as Usage under Article 9 of the CISG', 35 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (U. Pa. L. Rev.) (2013), 379–430, at 412–414 [– in English]  
Marlyse McQuillen, 'The Development of a Federal CISG Common Law in U.S. Courts: Patterns of Interpretation and Citation', 61 University of Miami Law Review (U. Miami L. Rev.) (2007), 509–537, at 519 [– in English]  
Marcia J. Staff, 'United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods: Lessons Learned from Five Years of Cases', 6 South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business (S.C. J. Int'l L. & Bus.) (2009), 1–52, at 12–13 [– in English]  
Full text and abstract of decision 2