Search for cases

CISG-online number
967
Case name
Ostroznik Savo et al. v. La Faraona soc. coop. a.r.l. et al.
Jurisdiction
Italy
Court
Tribunale di Padova (District Court Padova)
Judge
Dott. Alessandro Rizzieri (Sole judge)
Date of decision
11 January 2005
Claimants 2
Name
Ostroznik Savo, legal representative of Vzerja Kuncev
Place of business
Slovenia
Role in transaction
Seller
Name
Eurotrafic S.r.l.
Place of business
Italy
Respondents 2
Name
La Faraona soc. coop. a.r.l.
Place of business
Italy
Role in transaction
Buyer
Name
Banca di Credito Cooperativo di Roveredo di Guà
Place of business
Italy
Role in transaction
Guarantor of buyer‘s obligations
Seller 1
Name
Ostroznik Savo, legal representative of Vzerja Kuncev
Place of business
Slovenia
Buyer 1
Name
La Faraona soc. coop. a.r.l.
Place of business
Italy
Category of goods
0: Live animals other than animals in division 03
Goods as per contract
Rabbits (of the Hyla genetic strain)
CISG applicable
yes
Key CISG provisions interpreted
Art. 6
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 7(1); Art. 25; Art. 49(1)(b)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 73; Art. 1; Art. 26
Non-provision-specific issues addressed
Definition of 'contract of sale'
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 17
Scatolificio La Perla S.n.c. v. Martin Frischdienst GmbH
Tribunale di Padova (District Court Padova)
Italy, 31 March 2004 – 40466, CISG-online 823
SO.M.AGRI s.a.s. v. Erzeugerorganisation Marchfeldgemüse GmbH & Co. KG
Tribunale di Padova (District Court Padova)
Italy, 25 February 2004 – 40552, CISG-online 819
Traction Levage SA v. Drako Drahtseilerei Gustav Kocks GmbH
Cour d'appel de Paris (Court of Appeal Paris)
France, 06 November 2001 – 2000/04607, CISG-online 677
Gasoline and gas oil case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 22 October 2001 – 1 Ob 77/01g, CISG-online 614
Muller Ecole et Bureau v. Federal Trait
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 June 2001 – Q 99-16.118, CISG-online 598
Anton Huber GmbH & Co. KG v. Polyspace SA
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 26 June 2001 – 99-14.844 / 1093 FS-P, CISG-online 600
Romay AG v. Behr France S.a.r.l.
Cour d'appel de Colmar (Court of Appeal Colmar)
France, 12 June 2001 – 1 A 199800359, CISG-online 694
Rheinland Versicherungen v. Atlarex s.r.l.
Tribunale di Vigevano (District Court Vigevano)
Italy, 12 July 2000 – 405, CISG-online 493
Floor coverings case
Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart (Court of Appeal Stuttgart)
Germany, 28 February 2000 – 5 U 118/99, CISG-online 583
Tessile 21 S.r.l. v. Ixela S.A.
Tribunale di Pavia (District Court Pavia)
Italy, 29 December 1999, CISG-online 678
Calzados Magnanni v. Shoes General International S.a.r.l.
Cour d'appel de Grenoble (Court of Appeal Grenoble)
France, 21 October 1999 – 97/03974, CISG-online 574
Fitness equipment case I
Oberlandesgericht München (Court of Appeal Munich)
Germany, 09 July 1997 – 7 U 2246/97, CISG-online 281
Aluker v. Cerapul SA
Cour civile du Tribunal Cantonal de Vaud (Court of First Instance Canton Vaud)
Switzerland, 11 March 1996 – 01 93 1061 / 164/96/BA, CISG-online 333
Paprika powder case I
Landgericht Ellwangen (District Court Ellwangen)
Germany, 21 August 1995 – 1 KfH O 32/95, CISG-online 279
Used printing machines case I
Oberlandesgericht Celle (Court of Appeal Celle)
Germany, 24 May 1995 – 20 U 76/94, CISG-online 152
Joaquim Marques Roque v. Holding Manin Rivière S.a.r.l.
Cour d'appel de Grenoble (Court of Appeal Grenoble)
France, 26 April 1995 – 93/4879, CISG-online 154
Market research study case
Oberlandesgericht Köln (Court of Appeal Cologne)
Germany, 26 August 1994 – 19 U 282/93, CISG-online 132
This decision is cited by 5
ALAKart Kft. v. Pizzul S.r.l.
Tribunale di Trieste (District Court Trieste)
Italy, 17 June 2019 – 2640/2016, CISG-online 5184
Prada S.p.A. v. Caporicci USA Corp.
Camera Arbitrale Milano (CAM) (Milan Chamber of Arbitration)
Arbitration, 30 January 2019 – ARB/17/00120 (Final Award), CISG-online 5573
Carel Electronic Suzhou Co. Ltd. v. SY.DE.CO. S.r.l.
Tribunale di Forlì (District Court Forlì)
Italy, 12 November 2012 – 616/2011, CISG-online 2594
Officine Maraldi S.p.A. v. Intessa BCI S.p.A. et al.
Tribunale di Forlì (District Court Forlì)
Italy, 16 February 2009, CISG-online 1780
Mitias d.o.o. v. Solidea S.r.l.
Tribunale di Forlì (District Court Forlì)
Italy, 09 December 2008 – 2280/2007, CISG-online 1729
Decision published in 1
Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (Riv. dir. int. priv. e proc.) (2005), 791
CLOUT number
651
Case identifier in the old Albert H. Kritzer Database
050111i3
Comment on this decision 1
Cristina Chiomenti, 'Does the choice of a-national rules entail an implicit exclusion of the CISG? Comment on the decision of Tribunal of Padova (IT), 11 January 2005, Ostrotznik Savo v La Faraona', European Legal Forum (EuLF) (2005), 141–148 [– in English]  
Full text, translation and abstract of decision 3
Abstract of decision
CLOUT Abstract 651 (Language: English)
Full text of decision
Original language: Italian
Translation of decision
Language: English
translated by
Paolo Esposito