Search for cases

CISG-online number
1512
Case name
Cargolink S.A. v. Carbo UAB
Jurisdiction
Lithuania
Court
Lietuvos apeliacinis teismas (Court of Appeal of Lithuania)
Date of decision
27 March 2000
Case nr./docket nr.
2 A 85/2000
Claimant 1
Name
Carbo UAB
Place of business
Lithuania
Role in transaction
Seller
Respondent 1
Name
Cargolink S.A.
Place of business
Spain
Role in transaction
Buyer
Case History
Carbo UAB v. Cargolink S.A.
Vilnius International Commercial Arbitration Court (VICA)
Arbitration, 29 April 1999, CISG-online 3156
Present decision rejecting application to vacate (set aside) arbitral award
Seller 1
Name
Carbo UAB
Place of business
Lithuania
Buyer 1
Name
Cargolink S.A.
Place of business
Spain
Category of goods
24: Cork and wood
Goods as per contract
Wooden planks of spruce trees
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
Lithuanian law
Key CISG provisions interpreted and applied
Art. 9
Case identifier in the old Albert H. Kritzer Database
000327L1
Comments on this decision 2
Morten M. Fogt & Wolfgang Rosch, 'Habitudes entre les parties et clause d’arbitrage - Commentaire sommaire de la décision de la Cour d’Appel de Lituanie du 27 mars 2000', Recueil Dalloz (D.) (2003), Somm., 2369–2370 [– in French]
Morten M. Fogt, 'The Interaction and Distinction Between the Sales and Arbitration Regimes - The CISG and Agreements or Binding Practice to Arbitrate (Comment on the decision of the Danish Højesteret of 15 February 2001)', 26 American Review of International Arbitration (Am. Rev. Int. Arb.) (2015), 365–406 [– in English]