Search for cases

CISG-online number
1645
Case name
Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc.
Arbitral Tribunal
American Arbitration Association – International Centre for Dispute Resolution (AAA/ICDR)
Seat of the arbitration
New York (U.S.A.)
Date of decision
23 October 2007
Case nr./docket nr.
50181T 0036406 (Interim Award)
Claimant 1
Name
Globex International Inc.
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondent 1
Name
Macromex Srl.
Place of business
Romania
Role in transaction
Seller
Case History
Present decision
Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc.
American Arbitration Association – International Centre for Dispute Resolution (AAA/ICDR)
Arbitration, 12 December 2007 – 50181T 0036406 (Final Award), CISG-online 1647
Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 16 April 2008 – 08 Civ. 114 (SAS), CISG-online 1653
rejecting application to vacate (set aside) arbitral award
Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 26 May 2009 – 08-2255-cv, CISG-online 1837
affirming
Macromex Srl. v. Globex International Inc.
American Arbitration Association – International Centre for Dispute Resolution (AAA/ICDR)
Arbitration, 07 August 2007 – 50-181-T-00364-06 (Interim Award), CISG-online 6057
Seller 1
Name
Macromex Srl.
Place of business
Romania
Buyer 1
Name
Globex International Inc.
Place of business
USA
Category of goods
1: Meat and meat preparations
Goods as per contract
112 containers of frozen chicken parts
CISG applicable
yes
CISG applied
yes
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 7; Art. 9; Art. 25; Art. 26; Art. 29; Art. 49; Art. 74; Art. 79
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 11; Art. 33; Art. 35; Art. 45; Art. 51
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 11
Valero Marketing & Supply Co. v. Greeni Oy
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
USA, 04 April 2006 – 01-5254 (DRD), CISG-online 1216
Raw Materials Inc. v. Manfred Forberich GmbH & Co. KG
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 06 July 2004 – 1:03-cv-01154, CISG-online 925
Chicago Prime Packers, Inc. v. Northam Food Trading Co.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 21 May 2004 – 01 C 4447, CISG-online 851
Chateau des Charmes Wines Ltd. v. Sabaté USA, Inc. et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
USA, 05 May 2003 – 02-15727, CISG-online 767
Design of pagers case
Hof van Beroep Gent (Court of Appeal Ghent)
Belgium, 15 May 2002 – 2001/AR/0180, CISG-online 746
Milk powder case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 09 January 2002 – VIII ZR 304/00, CISG-online 651
Vine wax case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 24 March 1999 – VIII ZR 121/98, CISG-online 396
Canned oranges case I
China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC)
Arbitration, 30 November 1997 – CISG/1997/33, CISG-online 1412
Yugoslav caviar case
Arbitration Court attached to the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Arbitration, 10 December 1996 – VB 96074, CISG-online 774
Ukrainian coal case I
Arbitration Court at the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry
Arbitration, 24 April 1996 – 56/1995, CISG-online 435
Delchi Carrier, SpA v. Rotorex Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 06 December 1995 – 95-7182, 95-7186, CISG-online 140
This decision is cited by 1
KT MOTORSPORT spol. s r.o. v. Garage Vandecasteele NV
Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Supreme Court of the Czech Republic)
Czech Republic, 29 September 2022 – 23 Cdo 1062/2021, CISG-online 6766
Case identifier in the old Albert H. Kritzer Database
071023a5
Comment on this decision 1
Ş. Esra Kiraz & Esra Yıldız Üstün, 'COVID-19 and force majeure clauses: an examination of arbitral tribunal's awards', 25 Uniform Law Review/Revue de droit uniforme (Unif. L. Rev.) (2020), 437–465, at 459 [– in English]  
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision
Original language: English