Search for cases

CISG-online number
2301
Case name
Clay case
Jurisdiction
Germany
Court
Oberlandesgericht Koblenz (Court of Appeal Koblenz)
Chamber
6. Zivilsenat (6th panel for civil matters)
Judges
Ritter (Presiding Judge), Dr. von Gumpert (Judge), Linden (Judge)
Date of decision
24 February 2011
Case nr./docket nr.
6 U 555/07
Claimant 1
Place of business
Germany
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondent 1
Place of business
Netherlands
Role in transaction
Seller
Case History
Clay case
Landgericht Koblenz (District Court Koblenz)
Germany, 26 June 2007 – 4 HK.O 47/06, CISG-online 3235
Present decision reversing in part
Clay case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 26 September 2012 – VIII ZR 100/11, CISG-online 2348
Seller 1
Place of business
Netherlands
Role in trade
Dealer / Trader
Buyer 1
Place of business
Germany
Role in trade
Manufacturer purchasing goods as supplies for production purposes
Category of goods
27: Crude fertilizers, other than those of division 56, and crude minerals (excluding coal, petroleum and precious stones)
Goods as per contract
Ground clay (caolinite)
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
German law
Key CISG provisions interpreted and applied
Art. 7(1); Art. 25; Art. 35; Art. 45; Art. 74; Art. 77; Art. 80
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 2; Art. 5; Art. 7(2); Art. 8; Art. 30; Art. 38; Art. 39; Art. 40; Art. 79
Non-provision-specific issues addressed
Burden of proof; Duty to inform the other party; Limitation (prescription) period for claim arising under CISG contract; Parties‘ duty to cooperate; Relationship of CISG to pre-contractual liability under domestic law (culpa in contrahendo and others); Relationship of CISG to tort liability under domestic law; Role of good faith in CISG cases
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 5
Cooling machine case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 14 January 2002 – 7 Ob 301/01t, CISG-online 643
Milk powder case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 09 January 2002 – VIII ZR 304/00, CISG-online 651
Machinery case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 31 October 2001 – VIII ZR 60/01, CISG-online 617
Vine wax case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 24 March 1999 – VIII ZR 121/98, CISG-online 396
Propane gas case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 06 February 1996 – 10 Ob 518/95, CISG-online 224
This decision is cited by 1
PVC dry blend mixers case
Oberlandesgericht Jena (Court of Appeal Jena)
Germany, 29 April 2015 – 2 U 179/14, CISG-online 3466
Decision published in 6
Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2012), 148–159 [Full text – in German]
Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2012), 148–159 [Full text – in German]
Außenwirtschaftliche Praxis (AW-Prax) (2012), 433–436 [Full text – in German]
Außenwirtschaftliche Praxis (AW-Prax) (2012), 433–436 [Full text – in German]
Die deutsche Rechtsprechung auf dem Gebiete des Internationalen Privatrechts (IPRspr) (2011), No. 43, 100 [Leitsatz (headnote) – in German]
Die deutsche Rechtsprechung auf dem Gebiete des Internationalen Privatrechts (IPRspr) (2011), No. 43, 100 [Leitsatz (headnote) – in German]
European Case Law Identifier (ECLI)
ECLI:DE:OLGKOBL:2011:0224.6U555.07.0A
Comments on this decision 2
Morten M. Fogt, 'The Knowledge Test Under the CISG – A Global Threefold Distinction of Negligence, Gross Negligence and De Facto Knowledge', 34 Journal of Law & Commerce (J.L. & Com.) (2015), 23–111, at 59–61 [– in English]  
Katarzyna Kryla-Cudna, 'Internationality Overreach in the Interpretation of Uniform Private Law Conventions: The Contra Proferentem Rule and the CISG', 74(2) International and Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ) (2025), 437–466, at 460 [– in English]  
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision