Search for cases

CISG-online number
2793
Case name
ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical Prods. GmbH v. Energy Coal, S.p.A.
Jurisdiction
USA
Court
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County
Chamber
Commercial Division
Judge
Charles E. Ramos (Sole judge)
Date of decision
14 October 2015
Case nr./docket nr.
653938/14
Claimant 1
Name
ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical Products GmbH
Place of business
Germany
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondent 1
Name
Energy Coal, S.p.A.
Place of business
Italy
Role in transaction
Seller
Seller 1
Name
Energy Coal, S.p.A.
Place of business
Italy
Role in trade
Producer
Buyer 1
Name
ThyssenKrupp Metallurgical Products GmbH
Place of business
Germany
Role in trade
Dealer / Trader
Category of goods
33: Petroleum, petroleum products and related materials
Goods as per contract
25,000 metric tons of petroleum coke
CISG applicable
yes, due to parties' choice of the law of a CISG Contracting State
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
New York law
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 6; Art. 7(1); Art. 7(2); Art. 39(1)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 8; Art. 18; Art. 25; Art. 34; Art. 35; Art. 38
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 24
Orica Australia Pty Ltd v. Aston Evaporative Services, LLC
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
USA, 28 July 2015 – 14-cv-0412-WJM-CBS, CISG-online 2661
Eldesouky et al. v. Aziz et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 08 April 2015 – 11-CV-6986 (JLC), CISG-online 2852
U.S. Nonwovens Corp. v. Pack Line Corp.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County
USA, 12 March 2015 – 2015 NY Slip Op 25078, CISG-online 2676
Saint Tropez Inc. v. Ningbo Maywood Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. et al.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 16 July 2014 – 13 Civ. 5230 (NRB), CISG-online 3183
Profi-Parkiet sp. z o.o. v. Seneca Hardwoods LLC
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
USA, 23 May 2014 – 13 CV 4358 (PKC)(LB), CISG-online 2924
Microgem Corp., Inc. v. Homecast Co., Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 27 April 2012 – 10-Civ-3330 (RJS), CISG-online 3184
Maxxsonics USA, Inc. v. Fengshun Peiying Electro Acoustic Comp.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 21 March 2012 – 10 C 1174, CISG-online 2372
Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co., Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 28 September 2011 – 06 Civ. 3972 (LTS)(JCF), CISG-online 2338
Hanwha Corp. v. Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 18 January 2011 – 09 Civ. 10559 (AKH), CISG-online 2178
Electrocraft Arkansas, Inc. v. Super Electric Motors, Ltd
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
USA, 19 August 2010 – 4:09 CV 00318 SWW, CISG-online 2149
Dingxi Longhai Dairy, Ltd. v. Becwood Technology Group, L.L.C.
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
USA, 17 June 2010 – 08-762 (DSD/SRN), CISG-online 3186
San Lucio S.r.l. v. Import & Storage Services, LLC et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
USA, 15 April 2009 – 07-3031(WJM), CISG-online 1836
Filling and packaging plant case
Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt (Court of Appeal Canton Basel-Stadt)
Switzerland, 26 September 2008 – 16/2007/MEM/chi, CISG-online 1732
Hilaturas Miel, S.L. v. Republic of Iraq
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 20 August 2008 – 06 Civ 12, CISG-online 1777
Genpharm Inc. v. Pliva-Lachema A.S., Pliva d.d.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
USA, 19 March 2005 – 03-CV-2835 (ADS) (JO), CISG-online 1006
Carpets case I
Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe (Court of Appeal Karlsruhe)
Germany, 10 December 2003 – 7 U 40/02, CISG-online 911
BP Oil International, Ltd. v. Empresa Estatal Petroleos de Ecuador (PetroEcuador)
U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
USA, 11 June 2003 – 02-20166, CISG-online 730
Ajax Tool Works, Inc. v. Can-Eng Manufacturing Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 29 January 2003 – 01 C 5938, CISG-online 772
St. Paul Guardian Ins. Comp. v. Neuromed Medical Sys. & Support GmbH
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 20 December 2002 – 02-6095, 02-6103, CISG-online 3185
St. Paul Guardian Ins. Comp. v. Neuromed Medical Sys. & Support GmbH
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 26 March 2002 – 00-Civ934 (SHS), CISG-online 615
Machines case I
ICC International Court of Arbitration
Arbitration, 2002 – 11333 (Interim Award), CISG-online 1420
Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
USA, 30 July 2001 – C 01-20230 JW, CISG-online 616
Russian-English sales contract case
Международный коммерческий арбитражный суд при Торгово–промышленной палате Российской Федерации (Tribunal of International Commercial Arbitration at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MKAC))
Arbitration, 06 June 2000 – 406/1998, CISG-online 1249
Delchi Carrier, SpA v. Rotorex Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
USA, 06 December 1995 – 95-7182, 95-7186, CISG-online 140
This decision is cited by 2
New York State Dept. of Health v. Rusi Technology Co., Ltd.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Realturf Systems, S.L. v. Eurograss, Inc.
Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit (Miami-Dade County) of the State of Florida
USA, 18 March 2019 – 2014-CA-018348, CISG-online 6730
Decision published in 2
2015 NY Slip Op 31922[U],
2015 NY Misc LEXIS 3741 [Full text – in English]
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision
Original language: English