Search for cases

CISG-online number
2827
Case name
Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC
Jurisdiction
USA
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Judge
Joan B. Gottschall (Sole judge)
Date of decision
31 March 2017
Case nr./docket nr.
15 C 2207
Claimants 2
Name
Nucap Industries Inc.
Place of business
Canada
Role in transaction
Seller
Name
Nucap US Inc.
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Seller
Respondents 2
Name
Robert Bosch LLC
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Buyer
Name
Bosch Brake Components LLC
Place of business
USA
Role in transaction
Buyer
Case History
Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 29 August 2016 – 15-cv-2207, CISG-online 2929
Present decision
Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 23 August 2017 – 15 CV 2207, CISG-online 2930
Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLC
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 07 September 2019 – 15 C 02207, CISG-online 4541
Sellers 2
Name
Nucap Industries Inc.
Place of business
Canada
Name
Nucap US Inc.
Place of business
USA
Buyers 2
Name
Robert Bosch LLC
Place of business
USA
Name
Bosch Brake Components LLC
Place of business
USA
Category of goods
78: Road vehicles (including air-cushion vehicles)
Goods as per contract
Backing plates (components for aftermarket brake pads for vehicles)
CISG applicable
yes, agreement of the parties
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 6; Art. 8(1); Art. 8(3) (parol evidence rule); Art. 19(1)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 4; Art. 8(2); Art. 14(1); Art. 18(2); Art. 18(3); Art. 19(3)
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 13
VLM Food Trading Int'l, Inc. v. Illinois Trading Comp. et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 10 April 2014 – 13-1799 & 13-1697, CISG-online 2810
CSS Antenna, Inc. v. Amphenol-Tuchel Electronics GmbH
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
USA, 08 February 2011 – CCB-09-2008, CISG-online 2177
Remy, Inc. v. Technomatic, S.p.A.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
USA, 18 October 2010 – 1:08-cv-1227-SEB-WGH, CISG-online 2846
Chicago Prime Packers, Inc. v. Northam Food Trading Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
USA, 23 May 2005 – 04-2551, CISG-online 1026
Caterpillar, Inc. et al. v. Usinor Industeel et al.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 30 March 2005 – 04 C 2474, CISG-online 1007
Ajax Tool Works, Inc. v. Can-Eng Manufacturing Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 29 January 2003 – 01 C 5938, CISG-online 772
Usinor Industeel v. Leeco Steel Products, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 28 March 2002 – 02 C 0540, CISG-online 696
Asante Technologies, Inc. v. PMC-Sierra, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
USA, 30 July 2001 – C 01-20230 JW, CISG-online 616
Mitchell Aircraft Spares, Inc. v. European Aircraft Service AB
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
USA, 27 October 1998 – 97 C 5668, CISG-online 444
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center, Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostino S.p.A.
U.S. Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
USA, 29 June 1998 – 97-4250, CISG-online 342
Calzaturificio Claudia s.n.c. v. Olivieri Footwear Ltd.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 06 April 1998 – 96 Civ. 8052(HB)(THK), CISG-online 440
Beijing Metals & Minerals Import/Export Corp. v. American Business Center, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
USA, 15 June 1993 – 92-2171, CISG-online 89
Filanto S.p.A. v. Chilewich Int'l Corp.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 14 April 1992 – 91 CIV 3253 (CLB), CISG-online 45
This decision cites the following CISG-AC Opinion 1
CISG-AC Opinion No. 13 ‘Inclusion of Standard Terms under the CISG’ (Rapporteur: Sieg Eiselen), adopted by the CISG Advisory Council following its 17th meeting in Philadelphia (USA) on 20 January 2013
This decision is cited by 2
CoorsTek Korea Ltd. v. Loomis Products Company
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
USA, 17 February 2022 – 21-5168, CISG-online 5793
New York State Dept. of Health v. Rusi Technology Co., Ltd.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Albany County
USA, 25 January 2022 – 907022-21, CISG-online 5781
Decision published in 2
Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2018), 110–116
273 Federal Supplement, Third Series (F. Supp. 3d) 986
Comments on this decision 2
Kristen D. Adams & Candace Zierdt, 'CISG', 73 Business Lawyer (Bus. Law.) (2018), 1243–1254, at 1246–1248 [– in English]  
Michael P. Van Alstine, 'The Unified Field Solution to the Battle of the Forms Under the U.N. Sales Convention', 62 William & Mary Law Review (Wm. & Mary L. Rev.) (2020), 213–286, at 280 [– in English]  
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision
Original language: English