Search for cases

CISG-online number
3906
Case name
Electronic electricity meters case
Jurisdiction
Switzerland
Court
Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt (Court of Appeal Canton Basel-Stadt)
Judges
lic. iur. André Equey (Judge), Dr. Claudius Gelzer (Judge), Dr. Marie-Louise Stamm (Judge), Dr. Olivier Steiner (Judge), Prof. Dr. Ramon Mabillard (Judge), PD Dr. Benedikt Seiler (Gerichtsschreiber)
Date of decision
24 August 2018
Case nr./docket nr.
ZB.2017.20 (AG.2018.557)
Claimant 1
Name
IWB Industrielle Werke Basel
Place of business
Switzerland
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondents 2
Name
Iskraemeco d.d.
Place of business
Slovenia
Role in transaction
Seller
Name
Iskraemeco Schweiz AG
Place of business
Switzerland
Role in transaction
Seller
Case History
Electronic electricity meters case
Zivilgericht Basel-Stadt (Court of First Instance Basel-Stadt)
Switzerland, 26 October 2016 – K5.2015.2, CISG-online 3904
Present decision reversing
Electronic electricity meters case
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 28 May 2019 – 4A_543/2018, CISG-online 4463
affirming
Sellers 2
Name
Iskraemeco d.d.
Place of business
Slovenia
Name
Iskraemeco Schweiz AG
Place of business
Switzerland
Buyer 1
Name
IWB Industrielle Werke Basel
Place of business
Switzerland
Category of goods
87: Professional, scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus, not elsewhere specified
Goods as per contract
35,000 electronic electricity meters
CISG applicable
yes, Art. 1(1)(a)
CISG applied
yes
(Domestic) law applied in addition
Swiss law
Key CISG provisions interpreted and applied
Art. 1(1)(a) (applicability of the CISG to multi-party contract); Art. 2(c); Art. 2(f); Art. 6; Art. 21(1)
Key CISG provisions interpreted
Art. 7(1); Art. 18(2)
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 8; Art. 39(2); Art. 45(1)(b)
CISG provisions also cited
Art. 1(2); Art. 2(b); Art. 5; Art. 14 et seq.; Art. 14; Art. 18; Art. 23; Art. 27; Art. 35 et seq; Art. 36(2); Art. 39(2); Art. 45 et seq.; Art. 73
Non-provision-specific issues addressed
Assignment of claims from CISG contract; Assumption of debt; Remedies under domestic law (notably rescission of contract, claim for damages) because of party's mistake (error) at contract formation; Selection of seller by public tender
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 18
Potato chips plant case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 07 December 2017 – VII ZR 101/14, CISG-online 2961
Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Hosokawa Micron Int'l, Inc. et al.
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
USA, 20 July 2012 – MJG-11-1991, CISG-online 2343
Paprika powder case IV
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 14 February 2012 – 10 Ob 4/12d, CISG-online 2308
Cybernetix S.A. v. CD Systems de Columbia S.A.
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 13 September 2011 – 09-70305, CISG-online 2311
Turkish yarn case
Handelsgericht des Kantons Aargau (Commercial Court Canton Aargau)
Switzerland, 15 February 2011 – HOR.2009.29/DP/DP, CISG-online 2431
Hanwha Corp. v. Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
USA, 18 January 2011 – 09 Civ. 10559 (AKH), CISG-online 2178
StencilMaster 1621 case
Handelsgericht des Kantons St. Gallen (Commercial Court Canton St. Gallen)
Switzerland, 15 June 2010 – HG.2009.164, CISG-online 2159
Used car case II
Oberlandesgericht Hamm (Court of Appeal Hamm)
Germany, 02 April 2009 – 28 U 107/08, CISG-online 1978
Citroen Type C 5 case
Oberster Gerichtshof (Austrian Supreme Court)
Austria, 04 July 2007 – 2 Ob 95/06v, CISG-online 1560
Bruggen Deuren BVBA v. Top Deuren VOF
Rechtbank van Koophandel Hasselt (Commercial Court Hasselt)
Belgium, 19 April 2006 – A.R. 05/4177, CISG-online 1389
Citroen Type C 5 case
Oberlandesgericht Linz (Court of Appeal Linz)
Austria, 23 January 2006 – 6 R 160/05z, CISG-online 1377
Herbex Produtos S.A. v. Cogemar S.A.
Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court)
France, 25 October 2005 – 99-12.879, CISG-online 1098
Construction materials case IV
Tribunal Cantonal du Jura (Court of Appeal Canton Jura)
Switzerland, 03 November 2004 – Ap 91/04, CISG-online 965
Waste separation machines case
Handelsgericht des Kantons Zürich (Commercial Court Canton Zurich)
Switzerland, 09 July 2002 – HG000120/U/zs, CISG-online 726
Seafood and meat case
Oberlandesgericht Rostock (Court of Appeal Rostock)
Germany, 10 October 2001 – 6 U 126/00, CISG-online 671
Roland Schmidt GmbH v. Textil-Werke Blumenegg AG
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 22 December 2000 – 4C.296/2000, CISG-online 628
Used printing machines case I
Oberlandesgericht Celle (Court of Appeal Celle)
Germany, 24 May 1995 – 20 U 76/94, CISG-online 152
Hearing implants case
Landgericht Aachen (District Court Aachen)
Germany, 14 May 1993 – 43 O 136/92, CISG-online 86
This decision is cited by 1
Stolen wheel loader case
Obergericht des Kantons Zug (Court of Appeal Canton Zug)
Switzerland, 23 February 2023 – Z1 2022 6, CISG-online 6313
Editorial remark
The present decision has occasionally been published under the (incorrect) date of 17 April 2018. It was rendered on 28 August 2018.
Decision published in 2
Schweizerische Juristen-Zeitung (SJZ) / Revue Suisse de Jurisprudence (RSJ) (2019), 158–160 [Full text – in German]
Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2019), 101–116 [Full text – in German]
Comments on this decision 3
Viola Heutger, 'Rechtsprechung zum Wiener Kaufrecht in der Schweiz', Swiss Review of International and European Law (SRIEL) (2019), 691–701, at 694–699 [– in German]
Thomas Koller, '„Ansprüche im Zusammenhang mit der vertraglichen Beschaffenheit des Kaufobjekts“ im Spannungsfeld zwischen UN-Kaufrecht (CISG) und nationalem Recht', Jusletter (11. Mai 2020) [– in German]  
Ulrich G. Schroeter, 'Grenzfragen des Anwendungsbereichs und international einheitliche Auslegung des UN-Kaufrechts (CISG): Zugleich Anmerkung zu Appellationsgericht Basel-Stadt vom 24.8.2018 – ZB.2017.20 (AG.2018.557)', Internationales Handelsrecht (IHR) (2019), 133–136 [– in German]  
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision