Impact of Art. 14 on the interpretation of non-CISG provisions
Beyond its actual sphere of application, Art. 14 CISG has occasionally been used as guidance by courts when interpreting provisions of domestic or international law. Some examples are listed below.
Beleggings- en Exploitatiemaatschappij Nieuwburen B.V. v. DEM Management Services E.G.
Parket bij de Hoge Raad (Advocate General at the Dutch Supreme Court)
Netherlands, 07 October 2011 – 10/02469, CISG-online 5168
Parket bij de Hoge Raad (Advocate General at the Dutch Supreme Court)
Netherlands, 07 October 2011 – 10/02469, CISG-online 5168
Dutch tenancy agreement case
Parket bij de Hoge Raad (Advocate General at the Dutch Supreme Court)
Netherlands, 29 January 2016 – 15/00519, CISG-online 5304
Parket bij de Hoge Raad (Advocate General at the Dutch Supreme Court)
Netherlands, 29 January 2016 – 15/00519, CISG-online 5304
Rechtbank Utrecht (District Court Utrecht)
Netherlands, 01 August 2001 – 100993/HA ZA 99-958 / 110186/HA ZA 00-178, CISG-online 2299
