Search for cases

CISG-online number
1521
Case name
Pressure sensors case
Arbitral Tribunal
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC)
Seat of the arbitration
Stockholm (Sweden)
Arbitrator
Neil Kaplan (Sole arbitrator)
Date of decision
05 April 2007
Claimant 1
Place of business
China
Role in transaction
Buyer
Respondent 1
Place of business
Brazil
Role in transaction
Seller
Seller 1
Place of business
Brazil
Buyer 1
Place of business
China
Category of goods
87: Professional, scientific and controlling instruments and apparatus, not elsewhere specified
Goods as per contract
Pressure sensors
Key CISG provisions applied
Art. 25; Art. 35; Art. 49; Art. 74; Art. 78
This decision cites the following other CISG-online cases 2
FCF S.A. v. Adriafil Commerciale S.r.l. (Egyptian cotton case II)
Bundesgericht/Tribunal fédéral (Swiss Federal Supreme Court)
Switzerland, 15 September 2000 – 4C.105/2000, CISG-online 770
Cobalt sulphate case
Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court)
Germany, 03 April 1996 – VIII ZR 51/95, CISG-online 135
Case identifier in the old Albert H. Kritzer Database
070405s5
Comment on this decision 1
Eun-Bin Kim, 'An Arbitral Case Study on Burden of Proof for Non-Conformity of Goods Under CISG', 32(3) Journal of Arbitration Studies (J. Arb. Stud.) (2022), 71–91, at 86 [– in English]  
Full text of decision 1
Full text of decision
Original language: English